Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in the CABANA Trial

被引:146
|
作者
Poole, Jeanne E. [1 ]
Bahnson, Tristram D. [2 ]
Monahan, Kristi H. [3 ]
Johnson, George [4 ]
Rostami, Hoss [2 ]
Silverstein, Adam P. [2 ]
Al-Khalidi, Hussein R. [2 ]
Rosenberg, Yves [5 ]
Mark, Daniel B. [2 ]
Lee, Kerry L. [2 ]
Packer, Douglas L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Seattle Inst Cardiac Res, Seattle, WA USA
[5] NHLBI, NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
antiarrhythmic drug therapy; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; persistent atrial fibrillation; pulmonary vein isolation; PULMONARY-VEIN ABLATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; MULTICENTER; MANAGEMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The CABANA (Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation) trial ran-domized 2,204 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to catheter ablation or drug therapy. Analysis by intention-to-treat showed a nonsignificant 14% relative reduction in the primary outcome of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess recurrence of AF in the CABANA trial. METHODS The authors prospectively studied CABANA patients using a proprietary electrocardiogram recording monitor for symptom-activated and 24-h AF auto detection. The AF recurrence endpoint was any post-90-day blanking atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting 30 s or longer. Biannual 96-h Holter monitoring was used to assess AF burden. Patients who used the CABANA monitors and provided 90-day post-blanking recordings qualified for this analysis (n1/4 1,240; 56% of CABANA population). Treatment comparisons were performed using a modified intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS Median age of the 1,240 patients was 68 years, 34.4% were women, and AF was paroxysmal in 43.0%. Over 60 months of follow-up, first recurrence of any symptomatic or asymptomatic AF (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.60; p < 0.001) or first symptomatic-only AF (hazard ratio: 0.49; 95% con fidence interval: 0.39 to 0.61; p < 0.001) were both significantly reduced in the catheter ablation group. Baseline Holter AF burden in both treatment groups was 48%. At 12 months, AF burden in ablation patients averaged 6.3%, and in drug -therapy patients, 14.4%. AF burden was significantly less in catheter ablation compared with drug-therapy patients across the 5-year follow-up (p < 0.001). These findings were not sensitive to the baseline pattern of AF. CONCLUSIONS Catheter ablation was effective in reducing recurrence of any AF by 48% and symptomatic AF by 51% compared with drug therapy over 5 years of follow-up. Furthermore, AF burden was also significantly reduced in catheter ablation patients, regardless of their baseline AF type. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:3105 / 3118
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation (CABANA) Trial: Study Rationale and Design
    Packer, Douglas L.
    Mark, Daniel B.
    Robb, Richard A.
    Monahan, Kristi H.
    Bahnson, Tristram D.
    Moretz, Kathleen
    Poole, Jeanne E.
    Mascette, Alice
    Rosenberg, Yves
    Jeffries, Neal
    Al-Khalidi, Hussein R.
    Lee, Kerry L.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 199 : 192 - 199
  • [2] Cost-Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial
    Chew, Derek S.
    Li, Yanhong
    Cowper, Patricia A.
    Anstrom, Kevin J.
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    Poole, Jeanne E.
    Daniels, Melanie R.
    Monahan, Kristi H.
    Davidson-Ray, Linda
    Bahnson, Tristram D.
    Al-Khalidi, Hussein R.
    Lee, Kerry L.
    Packer, Douglas L.
    Mark, Daniel B.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2022, 146 (07) : 535 - 547
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in atrial fibrillation: The CABANA randomized clinical trial
    Estes, N. A. Mark, III
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (09) : 1573 - 1573
  • [4] CATHETER ABLATION VS. ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUG THERAPY FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: THE RESULTS OF THE CABANA MULTICENTER INTERNATIONAL RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Packer, Douglas L.
    Mark, Daniel B.
    Robb, Richard A.
    Monahan, Kristi H.
    Holmes, David R.
    Bahnson, Tristram D.
    Poole, Jeanne E.
    Rettmann, Maryam
    Rosenberg, Yves
    Jeffries, Neal
    Mitchell, Brent
    Flaker, Greg C.
    Pokushalov, Evgeny
    Romanov, Alexander
    Bunch, T. Jared
    Ardashev, Andrey
    Noelker, George
    Revishvili, Amiran
    Cappato, Riccardo
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Hindricks, Gerhard
    Davies, Wyn
    Silverstein, Adam
    Al-Khalidi, Hussein
    Lee, Kerry L.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2018, 15 (06) : 940 - 941
  • [5] Antiarrhythmic drug therapy after radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Turco, Pietro
    De Simone, Antonio
    La Rocca, Vincenzo
    Iuliano, Assunta
    Capuano, Vincenzo
    Astarita, Costantino
    Di Napoli, Tommaso
    Messina, Vincenzo
    Baldi, Silvano
    Stabile, Giuseppe
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 30 : S112 - S115
  • [6] Catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation
    Noheria, Amit
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Wylie, John V., Jr.
    Josephson, Mark E.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (06) : 581 - 586
  • [7] Effectiveness of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation
    Novak, Paul G.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 24 (01) : 9 - 17
  • [8] Sex difference in atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs
    Park, Yoon Jung
    Park, Je-Wook
    Yu, Hee Tae
    Kim, Tae-Hoon
    Uhm, Jae-Sun
    Joung, Boyoung
    Lee, Moon-Hyoung
    Pak, Hui-Nam
    [J]. HEART, 2023, 109 (07) : 519 - 526
  • [9] Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial
    Packer, Douglas L.
    Mark, Daniel B.
    Robb, Richard A.
    Monahan, Kristi H.
    Bahnson, Tristram D.
    Poole, Jeanne E.
    Noseworthy, Peter A.
    Rosenberg, Yves D.
    Jeffries, Neal
    Mitchell, L. Brent
    Flaker, Greg C.
    Pokushalov, Evgeny
    Romanov, Alexander
    Bunch, T. Jared
    Noelker, Georg
    Ardashev, Andrey
    Revishvili, Amiran
    Wilber, David J.
    Cappato, Riccardo
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Hindricks, Gerhard
    Davies, D. Wyn
    Kowey, Peter R.
    Naccarelli, Gerald V.
    Reiffel, James A.
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    Silverstein, Adam P.
    Al-Khalidi, Hussein R.
    Lee, Kerry L.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (13): : 1261 - 1274
  • [10] Managing Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Therapy?
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Packer, Douglas L.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 2 (06): : 599 - 602