Simulation-Based Policy Improvement for Energy Management in Commercial Office Buildings

被引:33
|
作者
Jia, Qing-Shan [1 ]
Shen, Jian-Xiang [1 ]
Xu, Zhan-Bo [2 ,3 ]
Guan, Xiao-Hong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Automat, TNLIST, Ctr Intelligent & Networked Syst CFINS, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, SKLMS Lab, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, MOE KLINNS Lab, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Building energy saving; discrete event dynamic system; simulationbased policy improvement; smart grid; STATE AGGREGATION; PROPERTY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TSG.2012.2214069
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Many commercial office buildings have become micro smart grids with on-site power generations, storage devices, and uncertain demands. Due to the pervasive nonlinearity and randomness of such a multi-energy system, simulation is usually the only faithful way to accurately describe the system dynamics and for performance evaluation. However, simulation is usually time-consuming and each sample path provides only noisy observations. Thus finding the optimal energy management policy is nontrivial. In this paper, a joint schedule problem is considered to schedule solar power, wind power, combined cooling, heating, and power generation, high temperature chiller, liquid desiccant fresh air unit, battery, and power grid in order to satisfy the electricity load, sensible heat load, and latent heat load in buildings with the minimal expected cost. We make two major contributions in this paper. First, three simulation-based policy improvement (SBPI) methods are developed to improve from given base policies. Second, the performance of these methods are systematically analyzed through numerical experiments. We show that when there are sufficient computing budget, the SBPI methods improve the given base policies. Different methods are recommended for problems with different computing budget. Sensitivity analysis of the policy and the value of accurate information are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2211 / 2223
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulation-based assessment of the energy savings benefits of integrated control in office buildings
    Shen E.
    Hong T.
    Building Simulation, 2009, 2 (4) : 239 - 251
  • [2] Simulation-based assessment of the energy savings benefits of integrated control in office buildings
    Shen, Eric
    Hong, Tianzhen
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2009, 2 (04) : 239 - 251
  • [3] Simulation-based coefficients for adjusting climate impact on energy consumption of commercial buildings
    Na Wang
    Atefe Makhmalbaf
    Viraj Srivastava
    John E. Hathaway
    Building Simulation, 2017, 10 : 309 - 322
  • [4] Simulation-based coefficients for adjusting climate impact on energy consumption of commercial buildings
    Wang, Na
    Makhmalbaf, Atefe
    Srivastava, Viraj
    Hathaway, John E.
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2017, 10 (03) : 309 - 322
  • [5] Applying simulation-based optimization to improve energy efficiency in two generic office buildings
    Zhou, Liang
    Morofsky, Edward
    Haghighat, Fariborz
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, PROCEEDINGS VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 371 - 378
  • [6] Development of a Simulation-Based Approach to Smart Management of Energy Consumption in Buildings and Their Implementation
    Pour, A. N. R.
    Cheng, K.
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXX, 2016, 3 : 357 - 362
  • [7] Sample Path Sharing in Simulation-Based Policy Improvement
    Wu, Di
    Jia, Qing-Shan
    Chen, Chun-Hung
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2014, : 3291 - 3296
  • [8] Uncertainty in the Energy Dynamics of Commercial Office Buildings
    Eisenhower, Bryan
    Mezic, Igor
    2012 IEEE 51ST ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2012, : 6945 - 6950
  • [9] Energy Audits in Large Commercial Office Buildings
    Shapiro, Ian
    ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2009, 51 (01) : 18 - +
  • [10] Energy audits in large commercial office buildings
    Taitem Engineering, Ithaca, NY, United States
    ASHRAE J, 2009, 1 (18+20+22+24+26-27):