CNN-Based Image Analysis for Malaria Diagnosis

被引:0
|
作者
Liang, Zhaohui [1 ]
Powell, Andrew [2 ]
Ersoy, Ilker [3 ]
Poostchi, Mahdieh [4 ]
Silamut, Kamolrat [5 ]
Palaniappan, Kannappan [4 ]
Guo, Peng [6 ]
Hossain, Md Amir [7 ]
Sameer, Antani [8 ]
Maude, Richard James [5 ]
Huang, Jimmy Xiangji [1 ]
Jaeger, Stefan [8 ]
Thoma, George [8 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Sch Informat Technol, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[2] Swarthmore Coll, Dept Comp Sci, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Dept Comp Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[5] Mahidol Univ, Mahidol Oxford Trop Med Res Unit, Bangkok, Thailand
[6] Missouri S&T, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[7] Chittagong Med Coll Hosp, Chittagong, Bangladesh
[8] NIH, Natl Lib Med, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
convolutional neural network; deep learning; malaria; computer-aided diagnosis; machine learning; ERYTHROCYTES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Malaria is a major global health threat. The standard way of diagnosing malaria is by visually examining blood smears for parasite-infected red blood cells under the microscope by qualified technicians. This method is inefficient and the diagnosis depends on the experience and the knowledge of the person doing the examination. Automatic image recognition technologies based on machine learning have been applied to malaria blood smears for diagnosis before. However, the practical performance has not been sufficient so far. This study proposes a new and robust machine learning model based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically classify single cells in thin blood smears on standard microscope slides as either infected or uninfected. In a ten-fold cross-validation based on 27,578 single cell images, the average accuracy of our new 16-layer CNN model is 97.37%. A transfer learning model only achieves 91.99% on the same images. The CNN model shows superiority over the transfer learning model in all performance indicators such as sensitivity (96.99% vs 89.00%), specificity (97.75% vs 94.98%), precision (97.73% vs 95.12%), F1 score (97.36% vs 90.24%), and Matthews correlation coefficient (94.75% vs 85.25%).
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 496
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CNN-Based Stereoscopic Image Inpainting
    Chen, Shen
    Ma, Wei
    Qin, Yue
    [J]. IMAGE AND GRAPHICS, ICIG 2019, PT III, 2019, 11903 : 95 - 106
  • [2] CNN-based Image Predictive Coding
    Tang, Tang
    Tetzlaff, Ronald
    [J]. 2014 14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CELLULAR NANOSCALE NETWORKS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (CNNA), 2014,
  • [3] CNN-Based Cell Analysis: From Image to Quantitative Representation
    Allier, Cedric
    Herve, Lionel
    Paviolo, Chiara
    Mandula, Ondrej
    Cioni, Olivier
    Pierre, William
    Andriani, Francesca
    Padmanabhan, Kiran
    Morales, Sophie
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2022, 9
  • [4] Applying Machine Learning to Healthcare Operations Management: CNN-Based Model for Malaria Diagnosis
    Cho, Young Sik
    Hong, Paul C.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (12)
  • [5] The effects of image smoothing on CNN-based detectors
    Skosana, Vusi
    Ngxande, Mkhuseli
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL SAUPEC/ROBMECH/PRASA CONFERENCE, 2020, : 68 - 73
  • [6] A CNN-BASED METHOD FOR SAR IMAGE DESPECKLING
    Ma, Dejiao
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    Tang, Xinxin
    Ming, Jing
    Shi, Jun
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019), 2019, : 4272 - 4275
  • [7] CNN-Based Adversarial Embedding for Image Steganography
    Tang, Weixuan
    Li, Bin
    Tan, Shunquan
    Barni, Mauro
    Huang, Jiwu
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, 2019, 14 (08) : 2074 - 2087
  • [8] CNN-Based Ternary Classification for Image Steganalysis
    Kang, Sanghoon
    Park, Hanhoon
    Park, Jong-Il
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2019, 8 (11)
  • [9] CNN-based image recognition for topology optimization
    Lee, Seunghye
    Kim, Hyunjoo
    Lieu, Qui X.
    Lee, Jaehong
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2020, 198
  • [10] Analysis of Adversarial Attacks against CNN-based Image Forgery Detectors
    Gragnaniello, Diego
    Marra, Francesco
    Poggi, Giovanni
    Verdoliva, Luisa
    [J]. 2018 26TH EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2018, : 967 - 971