Comparing the performance of SOFA, TPA combined with SOFA and APACHE-II for predicting ICU mortality in critically ill surgical patients: A secondary analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Xiao-Ming [1 ]
Zhang, Wen-Wu [1 ]
Yu, Xue-Zhong [2 ]
Dou, Qing-Li [1 ]
Cheng, Andy S. K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Dept Emergency, Affiliated Baoan Hosp, Peoples Hosp Baoan Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Sarcopenia; Mortality; Criticallyill; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; PROGNOSTIC ACCURACY; SIRS CRITERIA; QSOFA SCORE; SARCOPENIA; CANCER; IMPACT; CHEMOTHERAPY; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.clnu.2019.12.026
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Introduction: Total psoas muscle area (TPA) can indicate the status of the entire human body's skeletal muscle mass. It has been reported that lower TPA can increase the risk of mortality in critically ill patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between TPA and ICU mortality and to compare the performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), TPA combined with SOFA and Acute Physiology, Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II) for predicting ICU mortality in critically ill surgical patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective observational cohort study with a total of 96 critically ill surgical patients, ages 21-96 years old. Main outcome measures included difficult-to-wean (DTW), operation methods, ICU mortality, ICU stay, APACHE II, sepsis and SOFA. CT-scan assessed the TPA. It is acknowledged that the entire study was completed by Hao-Wei Kou et al. and the data were uploaded from plosone.com. The authors used this data only for secondary analysis. Results: The results showed that TPA is a protective factor for ICU mortality (OR: 0.99 95% [0.99, 1.00], P = 0.0269). In addition, when we defined sarcopenia-based TPA, our study showed that sarcopenia increased the risk of ICU mortality (OR:3.73 (1.27, 10.98) P = 0.0167. Furthermore, discrimination of ICU mortality was significantly higher using SOFA (AUROC, 0.7810 [99% CI, 0.6658-0.8962]) than either TPA (AUROC, 0.7023 [99% CI, 0.5552-0.8494]) or APACHE II score (AUROC, 0.7447 [99% CI, 0.6289-0.8604]). Additionally, when we combined TPA with SOFA score, the ROC of TPA thorn SOFA (AUROC, 0.8647 [99% CI, 0.7881-0.9412]) was the highest when compared to the other three models. Conclusion: The relationship between TPA and ICU mortality is negative in critically ill surgical patients. In addition, the combination of TPA and SOFA was the best tool among the three scoring systems in providing significant discriminative ability when predicting ICU mortality in critically ill surgical patients. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2902 / 2909
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients
    Tekin, Bilal
    Kilic, Jehat
    Taskin, Guerhan
    Solmaz, Ihsan
    Tezel, Onur
    Basgoz, Bilgin Bahadir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2024, 18 (01): : 122 - 130
  • [2] Mean SOFA Score in Comparison With APACHE II Score in Predicting Mortality in Surgical Patients With Sepsis
    Thakur, Radhika
    Rohith, Vakulabharanam Naga
    Arora, Jainendra K.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [3] SOFA score is superior to APACHE-II score in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy
    Wang, Hai
    Kang, Xiao
    Shi, Yu
    Bai, Zheng-hai
    Lv, Jun-hua
    Sun, Jiang-li
    Pei, Hong Hong
    [J]. RENAL FAILURE, 2020, 42 (01) : 638 - 645
  • [4] Prediction of Outcome in Critically Ill Elderly Patients using APACHE II and SOFA Scores
    Qiao, Q.
    Lu, G.
    Li, M.
    Shen, Y.
    Xu, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (03) : 1114 - 1121
  • [5] COMPARISON OF CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT TO APACHE-II FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY RISK IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    KRUSE, JA
    THILLBAHAROZIAN, MC
    CARLSON, RW
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1987, 15 (04) : 449 - 449
  • [6] Superiority of Apache IV Versus SOFA & qSOFA in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Sepsis Admitted to the ICU
    Pattison, R.
    Shakespeare, A.
    Tanner, S. B.
    Zolfaghari, K.
    Ettlinger, J.
    Jimenez, E.
    White, H. D.
    Arroliga, A.
    Ghamande, S. A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [7] Efficacy of the APACHE II score at ICU discharge in predicting post-ICU mortality and ICU readmission in critically ill surgical patients
    Lee, H.
    Lim, C. W.
    Hong, H. P.
    Ju, J. W.
    Jeon, Y. T.
    Hwang, J. W.
    Park, H. P.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2015, 43 (02) : 175 - 186
  • [8] PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF CLINICAL JUDGMENT AND APACHE-II SCORE IN PREDICTING THE OUTCOME IN CRITICALLY ILL SURGICAL PATIENTS
    MEYER, AA
    MESSICK, WJ
    YOUNG, P
    BAKER, CC
    FAKHRY, S
    MUAKKASSA, F
    RUTHERFORD, EJ
    NAPOLITANO, LM
    RUTLEDGE, R
    NELSON, LD
    LEVISON, M
    BORZOTTA, AP
    EHRLICH, F
    AGARWAL, N
    DELLINGER, EP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1992, 32 (06): : 747 - 754
  • [9] COMPARISON APACHE-II AND THE MORTALITY PREDICTION MODEL FOR PREDICTING SURVIVAL OF CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS
    SILVERSTEIN, MD
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1988, 36 (03): : A350 - A350
  • [10] Usefulness of APACHE-II, SOFA, ISARIC/WHO 4C Mortality Score and CO-RADS for Mortality Prediction of Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease-2019 Patients
    Sungurtekin, Hulya
    Sargin, Fatih
    Kilinc, Metin
    Kahramanoglu, Mithat
    Akbulut, Mert
    Ayoglu, Ferruh
    Caliskan, Ahmet
    Karaduman, Simay
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE-TURK YOGUN BAKIM DERGISI, 2023, 21 (02): : 100 - 109