Cost of energy and environmental policy in Portuguese CO2 abatement -: scenario analysis to 2020

被引:53
|
作者
Simoes, Sofia [1 ]
Cleto, Joao [1 ]
Fortes, Patricia [1 ]
Seixas, Julia [1 ]
Huppes, Gjalt [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, P-2829516 Caparica, Portugal
[2] Leiden Univ, CML Inst Environm Sci, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
CO2 marginal abatement cost; Portuguese energy policies;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper quantifies the contribution of Portuguese energy policies for total and marginal abatement costs (MAC) for CO2 emissions for 2020. The TIMES_PT optimisation model was used to derive MAC curves from a set of policy scenarios including one or more of the following policies: ban on nuclear power; ban on new coal power plants without carbon sequestration an storage: incentives to natural gas power plants: and a cap on biomass use. The different MAC shows the policies' effects in the potential for CO2 abatement. In 2020, in the most encompassing policy scenario, with all current and planned policies, is possible to abate only Lip to +35% of 1990 emissions at a cost below 23 epsilon t/CO2. In the more flexible policy scenarios, it is possible to abate up to - 10% of 1990 emissions below the same cost. The total energy system costs are 10-13% higher if all policies are implemented-76 to 101 B epsilon-roughly the equivalent to 2.01-2.65% of the 2005 CDR Thus, from a CO2 emission mitigation perspective, the existing policies introduce significant inefficiencies, possibly related to other policy goals. The ban on nuclear power is the instrument that has the most significant effect in MAC. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3598 / 3611
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Role of the energy-carbon-economy nexus and CO2 abatement cost in supporting energy policy analysis: A multi-scenario analysis of the Java']Java-Bali system
    Sarjiya
    Putranto, Lesnanto Multa
    Budi, Rizki Firmansyah Setya
    Novitasari, Dwi
    Deendarlianto
    Tumiran
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 187
  • [2] Scenario analysis of CO2 emission abatement effect based on LEAP
    Cai Liya
    Guo Jianfeng
    [J]. CLEANER ENERGY FOR CLEANER CITIES, 2018, 152 : 965 - 970
  • [3] CO2 abatement policy with learning-by-doing in renewable energy
    Rasmussen, TN
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2001, 23 (04) : 297 - 325
  • [4] Renewable energy and CO2 abatement in Italy
    Marcantonini, Claudio
    Valero, Vanessa
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 106 : 600 - 613
  • [5] CO2 ABATEMENT COST IN WEST-GERMANY
    CONRAD, F
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1990, 18 (07) : 669 - 671
  • [6] Energy-saving behavior and marginal abatement cost for household CO2 emissions
    Hamamoto, Mitsutsugu
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 809 - 813
  • [7] Regional differences in China's CO2 abatement cost
    He, Xiaoping
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 80 : 145 - 152
  • [8] The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry
    Hasanbeigi, Ali
    Menke, Christoph
    Price, Lynn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (15) : 1509 - 1518
  • [9] CO2 Marginal Abatement Cost and Determinants——An Empirical Analysis of Sample Cities in China
    魏楚
    [J]. China Economist, 2015, 10 (01) : 102 - 125
  • [10] Comparison of CO2 abatement by use of renewable energy and CO2 capture and storage
    Davison, J
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 851 - 856