Optimal R&D Intensity: Welfare Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Byung Woo
机构
关键词
R&D intensity; product innovation; spillover; social optimum;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Not only has spending on research in Korea been growing in real terms, but its relative importance compared to other economic activities has been steadily increasing as well in Korea. In this paper, we introduce the socially optimal share of R&D in the economic growth model. We consider both laissez-faire(market equilibrium) steady-state growth rate and the social optimum. Because individuals and individual firms do not internalize the effect of individual knowledge accumulation when optimizing on consumption and capital accumulation, the equilibrium growth rate may be less than the socially optimal rate of growth. We develop the model(Jones and Williams, 2000) that find the decentralized economy typically underinvests in R&D relative to what is socially optimum. We also examine how far deviates the steady-state growth rate from social optimum in Korean economy. We focus here on the positive external effects of R&D. According to ordinary LS analysis, the estimate of X (the elasticity of knowledge production to R&D personnel) is 0.1559. So, we can see the optimal R&D share in Korea is 3.32%. This implies that the ratio of optimal share to market share of R&D in Korea is 1.8. According to Johansen(1991)'s cointegration analysis, the estimate of X ranges from 0.294 to 0.365. So, we can see that the lower bound for the optimal share of R&D in Korea, is 3.74%. In brief, from all cases of the form for the knowledge production function, we could decide that both the intertemporal-spillover and appropriability effects in Korean economy tend to make the average growth rate less than optimal. Because the business-stealing effect that tends to make it greater than optimal conflicts and is dominated by the former two effects, the laissez-faire average growth rate in Korea may be less than optimal.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 36
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] R&D welfare
    Kress, RW
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 1999, 102 (01): : 15 - 15
  • [2] An analysis of dynamism between market sensitivity to technology and optimal R&D intensity
    Tou, Yuji
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND VALUE CREATION, 2008, 2 : 73 - 87
  • [3] End R&D "welfare"
    Zachary, GP
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 101 (06): : 33 - 33
  • [4] The Welfare Comparative Analysis of R&D Policies in Open Economy
    Liu Jianping
    Zheng Xutao
    Zhang Xingquan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION & MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 3179 - 3184
  • [5] Technology licensing, R&D and welfare
    Chang, Ray-Yun
    Hwang, Hong
    Peng, Cheng-Hau
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 118 (02) : 396 - 399
  • [6] Optimal R&D outsourcing
    Leoni, Patrick L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2018, 14 (02) : 201 - 205
  • [7] Does Optimal R&D Intensity Level Exist in Chinese Defense Enterprises?
    Su, Chi-Wei
    Wang, Kai-Hua
    Tao, Ran
    Lobont, Oana-Ramona
    Moldovan, Nicoleta-Claudia
    [J]. DEFENCE AND PEACE ECONOMICS, 2021, 32 (01) : 107 - 124
  • [8] R&D intensity and the performance of IPOs
    Chen, Roger C. Y.
    Wang, Chao-Shi
    Shi, Ru-Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND LEARNING, 2008, 5 (03) : 241 - 254
  • [9] R&D intensity and financial performance
    Goto, Mika
    Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki
    [J]. IEMC - EUROPE 2008: INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, EUROPE, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: MANAGING ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR GROWTH, 2008, : 235 - 239
  • [10] R&D INTENSITY AND MARKET REGULATION
    Ledezma, Ivan
    [J]. REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 60 (03): : 797 - 806