Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance

被引:63
|
作者
O'Brien, D. [1 ]
Hennessy, T. [2 ]
Moran, B. [2 ]
Shalloo, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Livestock Syst Res Dept, Fermoy, Cork, Ireland
[2] TEAGASC, Rural Econ Res Ctr, Athenry, Galway, Ireland
关键词
milk; carbon footprint; profit; greenhouse gas; life cycle assessment; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENTERIC METHANE EMISSIONS; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; CONCENTRATE SUPPLEMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; RUMINANTS; REDUCE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2014-9222
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per unit of milk or the carbon footprint (CF) of milk is a key issue for the European dairy sector given rising concerns over the potential adverse effects of climate change. Several strategies are available to mitigate GHG emissions, but producing milk with a low CF does not necessarily imply that a dairy farm is economically viable. Therefore, to understand the relationship between the CF of milk and dairy farm economic performance, the farm accountancy network database of a European Union nation (Ireland) was applied to a GHG emission model. The method used to quantify GHG emissions was life cycle assessment (LCA), which was independently certified to comply with the British standard for LCA. The model calculated annual on- and off-farm GHG emissions from imported inputs (e.g., electricity) up to the point milk was sold from the farm in CO2-equivalent (CO2-eq). Annual GHG emissions computed using LCA were allocated to milk based on the economic value of dairy farm products and expressed per kilogram of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM). The results showed for a nationally representative sample of 221 grass-based Irish dairy farms in 2012 that gross profit averaged (sic)0.18/L of milk and (sic)1,758/ha and gross income was (sic)40,899/labor unit. Net profit averaged (sic)0.08/L of milk and (sic)750/ha and net income averaged (sic)18,125/labor unit. However, significant variability was noted in farm performance across each financial output measure. For instance, net margin per hectare of the top one-third of farms was 6.5 times higher than the bottom third. Financial performance measures were inversely correlated with the CF of milk, which averaged 1.20 kg of CO2-eq/kg of FPCM but ranged from 0.60 to 2.13 kg of CO2-eq/kg of FPCM. Partial least squares regression analysis of correlations between financial and environmental performance indicated that extending the length of the grazing season and increasing milk production per hectare or per cow reduced the CF of milk and increased farm profit. However, where higher milk production per hectare was associated with greater concentrate feeding, this adversely affected the CF of milk and economic performance by increasing both costs and off-farm emissions. Therefore, to mitigate the CF of milk and improve economic performance, grass-based dairy farms should not aim to only increase milk output, but instead target increasing milk production per hectare from grazed grass.
引用
收藏
页码:7394 / 7407
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon footprint and economic performance of dairy farms: The case of protected designation of origin farms in France
    Lambotte, Mathieu
    De Cara, Stephane
    Brocas, Catherine
    Bellassen, Valentin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 186
  • [2] Carbon Footprint of Milk from Pasture-Based Dairy Farms in Azores, Portugal
    Morais, Tiago G.
    Teixeira, Ricardo F. M.
    Rodrigues, Nuno R.
    Domingos, Tiago
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [3] Integration of ecosystem services into the carbon footprint of milk of South German dairy farms
    Kiefer, Lukas Robert
    Menzel, Friederike
    Bahrs, Enno
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 152 : 11 - 18
  • [4] Variation in the carbon footprint of milk production on smallholder dairy farms in central Kenya
    Wilkes, Andreas
    Wassie, Shimels
    Odhong, Charles
    Fraval, Simon
    van Dijk, Suzanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 265
  • [5] Variation in carbon footprint of milk due to management differences between Swedish dairy farms
    Henriksson, M.
    Flysjo, A.
    Cederberg, C.
    Swensson, C.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2011, 5 (09) : 1474 - 1484
  • [6] Carbon footprint of milk production from dairy cows in Australia
    Gollnow, Sebastian
    Lundie, Sven
    Moore, Andrew D.
    McLaren, Jake
    van Buuren, Neil
    Stahle, Peter
    Christie, Karen
    Thylmann, Daniel
    Rehl, Torsten
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2014, 37 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [7] A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms
    O'Brien, D.
    Capper, J. L.
    Garnsworthy, P. C.
    Grainger, C.
    Shalloo, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (03) : 1835 - 1851
  • [8] Carbon footprint of milk produced at Italian buffalo farms
    Pirlo, G.
    Terzano, G.
    Pacelli, C.
    Abeni, F.
    Care, S.
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2014, 161 : 176 - 184
  • [9] Assessment of policy conflict using systems thinking: A case study of carbon footprint reduction on Irish dairy farms
    Paterson, Kirsty C.
    Holden, Nicholas M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2019, 101 : 38 - 45
  • [10] Factors influencing the carbon footprint of milk production on dairy farms with different feeding strategies in western Europe
    Sorley, Marion
    Casey, Imelda
    Styles, David
    Merino, Pilar
    Trindade, Henrique
    Mulholland, Martin
    Zafra, Cesar Resch
    Keatinge, Ray
    Le Gallj, Andre
    O'Brien, Donal
    Humphreys, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 435