Review of multi-criteria decision aid for integrated sustainability assessment of urban water systems

被引:84
|
作者
Lai, E. [1 ]
Lundie, S. [1 ]
Ashbolt, N. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ctr Water & Waste Technol, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] US EPA, NERL, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
multi-criteria decision aid; integrated framework; decision making; shortcomings; sustainability assessment; urban water;
D O I
10.1080/15730620802041038
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Integrated sustainability assessment is part of a new paradigm for urban water decision making. Multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) is an integrative framework used in urban water sustainability assessment, which has a particular focus on utilising stakeholder participation. Here MCDA is reviewed in the context of urban water management used in a decision making framework. Three other commonly used integrated approaches in urban water management (cost-benefit analysis, triple bottom line and integrated assessment) are compared with MCDA. Generic types of shortcomings associated with MCDA are discussed to provide an understanding of MCDA's limitation in urban water management decision making; including 1) preferential independency, 2) double counting and under-counting, and 3) transparency of MCDA methods and results.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 327
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management
    Zarghami, Mahdi
    Abrishamchi, Ahmad
    Ardakanian, Reza
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2008, 22 (08) : 1017 - 1029
  • [2] Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management
    Zarghaami, Mahdi
    Abrishamchi, Ahmad
    Ardakanian, Reza
    [J]. Sustainable Water Management Solutions for Large Cities, 2005, 293 : 73 - 82
  • [3] Multi-criteria Decision Making for Integrated Urban Water Management
    Mahdi Zarghami
    Ahmad Abrishamchi
    Reza Ardakanian
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2008, 22 : 1017 - 1029
  • [4] Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the sustainability assessment of sewerage pipe systems
    de la Fuente, Albert
    Pons, Oriol
    Josa, Alejandro
    Aguado, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 4762 - 4770
  • [5] Participatory multi-criteria decision aid: Operationalizing an integrated assessment of ecosystem services
    Langemeyer, Johannes
    Palomo, Ignacio
    Baraibar, Sergio
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 30 : 49 - 60
  • [6] An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Sustainability of Industrial Eco-systems
    Wang, Fang
    Jia, Xiao-Ping
    [J]. 2010 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ICBBE 2010), 2010,
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision making/aid methods for assessing agricultural sustainability: A literature review
    Cicciu, Bruno
    Schramm, Fernando
    Schramm, Vanessa Batista
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 138 : 85 - 96
  • [8] Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review
    Sadok, Walid
    Angevin, Frederique
    Bergez, Jacques-Eric
    Bockstaller, Christian
    Colomb, Bruno
    Guichard, Laurence
    Reau, Raymond
    Dore, Thierry
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 28 (01) : 163 - 174
  • [9] Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review
    Walid Sadok
    Frédérique Angevin
    Jacques-Éric Bergez
    Christian Bockstaller
    Bruno Colomb
    Laurence Guichard
    Raymond Reau
    Thierry Doré
    [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2008, 28 : 163 - 174
  • [10] Assessment of sustainable drainage strategies in urban water systems using urban water metabolism and multi-criteria decision analyses
    Garcia, Maria Vitoria da Silva
    Moruzzi, Rodrigo Braga
    Behzadian, Kourosh
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 88 (11) : 2809 - 2825