Microtensile Bond Strength of Porcelain Laminate Veneers Bonded to Fluorosed Teeth

被引:8
|
作者
Ratnaweera, Priyadarshanee M. [1 ]
Fukagawa, Nao [1 ]
Tsubota, Yuji [1 ]
Fukushima, Shunji [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsurumi Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Microtensile bond strength; porcelain laminate veneers; fluorosed teeth;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00403.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strengths (MTBSs) of porcelain laminate veneers bonded to normal and fluorosed teeth. Materials and Method: Forty human incisors, including 20 normal and 20 moderately fluorosed teeth [Thylstrup Fejerskov Index (TFI) = 4 to 6], were collected. The labial surfaces of the teeth were ground up to 1 mm and polished with #600 silicon carbide abrasive paper. The surfaces were bonded to 1-mm-thick ceramic slices (5 x 5 mm(2)) previously made (VitaVM7) using one of two ceramic cement systems (RelyX or Clapearl) following the manufacturers' instructions. A resin composite was added on top of the ceramic slices and built up to 5-mm thickness to serve as grips. The specimens were stored in water (37 degrees C) for 24 hours, and beams of adhesive interface with a surface area of similar to 1.25 mm(2) were obtained. Then the beams were subjected to MTBS tests at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Results: The results of the MTBS test (MPa) were 20.55 +/- 5.83 (RelyX/fluorosed), 20.16 +/- 4.61 (RelyX/normal), 18.74 +/- 2.88 (Clapearl/fluorosed), and 21.06 +/- 4.99 (Clapearl/normal). There were no significant differences in the MTBSs among the four groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The MTBSs of ceramic cement systems used were not influenced by the moderately fluorosed teeth.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 210
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PORCELAIN LAMINATE VENEERS BONDED TO ETCHED ENAMEL
    HORN, HR
    [J]. DENTAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1983, 27 (04) : 671 - 684
  • [2] The strength of anterior teeth restored with bonded porcelain veneers and crowns.
    Roulet, JF
    Raffelt, C
    Pfeiffer, H
    Blunck, U
    Chun, YH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A414 - A414
  • [3] Nonvital Teeth and Porcelain Laminate Veneers-A Contradiction?
    Meyenberg, Konrad H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 1 (03): : 192 - 206
  • [4] Effect of die spacer thickness on shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers
    Cho, SH
    Chang, WG
    Lim, BS
    Lee, YK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 95 (03): : 201 - 208
  • [5] EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF GLOVE COATING ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF PORCELAIN LAMINATE VENEERS
    HOLTAN, JR
    LUA, MJ
    BELVEDERE, PC
    LAMBERT, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 126 (05): : 611 - 616
  • [6] THE BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE LAMINATE VENEERS
    WALLS, AWG
    MCCABE, JF
    MURRAY, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1985, 64 (10) : 1261 - 1264
  • [7] THE BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE LAMINATE VENEERS
    WALLS, AWG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1985, 64 (04) : 663 - 663
  • [8] Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneer bonded with flowable composite
    Barceleiro, MO
    Miranda, MS
    Dias, KRHC
    Sekito, T
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2003, 28 (04) : 423 - 428
  • [9] MICROLEAKAGE AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN AND PORCELAIN VENEERS BONDED TO CAST ALLOYS
    JONES, RM
    MOORE, BK
    GOODACRE, CJ
    MUNOZVIVEROS, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1991, 65 (02): : 221 - 228