Neoatherosclerosis 5 Years After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation

被引:41
|
作者
Moriyama, Noriaki [1 ]
Shishido, Koki [1 ]
Tanaka, Yutaka [1 ]
Yokota, Shohei [1 ]
Hayashi, Takahiro [1 ]
Miyashita, Hirokazu [1 ]
Koike, Tatsuya [1 ]
Yokoyama, Hiroaki [1 ]
Takada, Takuma [1 ]
Nishimoto, Takashi [1 ]
Ochiai, Tomoki [1 ]
Tobita, Kazuki [1 ]
Yamanaka, Futoshi [1 ]
Mizuno, Shingo [1 ]
Murakami, Masato [1 ]
Takahashi, Saeko [1 ]
Saito, Shigeru [1 ]
机构
[1] Shonan Kamakura Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Catheterizat Labs, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa 2478533, Japan
关键词
bioresorbable vascular scaffold; neoatherosclerosis; optical coherence tomography; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING STENT; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; SERIAL ASSESSMENT; METALLIC STENTS; ABSORB; TRIAL; NEOVASCULARIZATION; CALCIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Data regarding neoatherosclerosis after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (ABSORB BVS Rev. 1.1, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) implantation are limited. OBJECTIVES This study investigated the findings of neoatherosclerosis at 5 years after BVS 1.1 implantation by using multi-imaging modalities, including optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS Patients included in the ABSORB EXTEND (ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation) trial at Shonan Kamakura General Hospital underwent OCT at baseline after the index procedure and at 1 and 5 years. Intimal plaque distributions in the in-scaffold and out-scaffold segments were analyzed. RESULTS Twenty patients (22 lesions) with stable angina pectoris were enrolled. The median follow-up duration was 67 months (interquartile range: 65 to 69months), and the mean age was 69 +/- 8 years. Patients with diabetes mellitus (25%) were included. Based on the baseline angiogram, 10 (46%) lesions were type B2/C lesions. At 1 and 5 years of follow-up, significant differences in the prevalence of in-scaffold lipid-laden neointima (17% vs. 61%; p = 0.04), calcification (28% vs. 94%; p < 0.01), neovascularization (6% vs. 78%; p < 0.01), and thin-cap fibroatheroma (0% vs. 22%; p = 0.02) were found. In the out-scaffold segments, no significant difference in the plaque prevalence between 1 and 5 years was noted. CONCLUSIONS The occurrence and progression of in-scaffold neoatherosclerosis with luminal narrowing was observed at 5 years after BVS 1.1 implantation. The small size of the current study warrants confirmation in larger study. (ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation [ABSORB EXTEND]; NCT01023789) (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1882 / 1893
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early neoatherosclerosis after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: insights from optical coherence tomography
    Sato, Takao
    Richardt, Gert
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2016, 27 (07) : 616 - 617
  • [2] In-scaffold neovascularization of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold after 6 years of implantation
    Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
    Revaiah, Pruthvi C.
    Kasinadhuni, Ganesh
    Vemuri, Krishna Santosh
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2020, 4 (04)
  • [3] Neoatherosclerosis as the Cause of Late Failure of a Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold
    Mangiameli, Andrea
    Ohno, Yohei
    Attizzani, Guilherme F.
    Capodanno, Davide
    Tamburino, Corrado
    JACC-Cardiovascular Interventions, 2015, 8 (04) : 633 - 634
  • [4] Recurrent Neoatherosclerosis After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis
    Bastante, Teresa
    Rivero, Fernando
    Benedicto, Amparo
    Cuesta, Javier
    Alfonso, Fernando
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (09) : 1264 - 1265
  • [5] Neoatherosclerosis development following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in diabetic and non-diabetic swine
    van Ditzhuijzenl, Nienke S.
    Kurata, Mie
    van den Heuvel, Mieke
    Sorop, Oana
    van Duin, Richard W. B.
    Krabbendam-Peters, Ilona
    Ligthart, Jurgen
    Witberg, Karen
    Murawska, Magdalena
    Bouma, Brett
    Villiger, Martin
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Zipstra, Felix
    van Soest, Gijs
    Duncker, Dirk-Jan
    Regar, Evelyn
    van Beusekom, Heleen M. M.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [6] ASSOCIATION OF WALL SHEAR STRESS WITH VASCULAR HEALING RESPONSE BY OCT 5 YEARS AFTER BIORESORBABLE SCAFFOLD IMPLANTATION
    Karanasos, Antonios
    Schuurbiers, Johan
    Gnanadesigan, Muthukaruppan
    van Ditzhuijzen, Nienke
    Dijkstra, Jouke
    van Soest, Gijs
    Zijlstra, Felix
    van Geuns, Robert
    Wentzel, Jolanda
    Regar, Evelyn
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A1772 - A1772
  • [7] Endothelial shear stress 5 years after implantation of a coronary bioresorbable scaffold
    Thondapu, Vikas
    Tenekecioglu, Erhan
    Poon, Eric K. W.
    Collet, Carlos
    Torii, Ryo
    Bourantas, Christos V.
    Chin, Cheng
    Sotomi, Yohei
    Jonker, Hans
    Dijkstra, Jouke
    Revalor, Eve
    Gijsen, Frank
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    Ooi, Andrew
    Barlis, Peter
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (18) : 1602 - +
  • [8] Preclinical evaluation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) on the reduction of neoatherosclerosis
    Nicol, P.
    Bulin, A.
    Castellanos, M. I.
    Stoeger, M.
    Obermeier, S.
    Fischer, J.
    Baumgartner, C.
    Steiger, K.
    Joner, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 528 - 528
  • [9] Vascular Healing of a False Lumen After Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation
    Kawamoto, Hiroyoshi
    Jabbour, Richard J.
    Tanaka, Akihito
    Latib, Azeem
    Colombo, Antonio
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (02)
  • [10] Expansion and Malapposition Characteristics After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation
    Brown, Adam J.
    McCormick, Liam M.
    Braganza, Denise M.
    Bennett, Martin R.
    Hoole, Stephen P.
    West, Nick E. J.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 84 (01) : 37 - 45