Decentralized failure diagnosis of discrete event systems

被引:185
|
作者
Qiu, WB [1 ]
Kumar, R
机构
[1] Corning Inc, Sullivan Pk Res Ctr, Corning, NY 14831 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
codiagnosability; decentralized diagnosis; diagnosability; discrete-event systems; failure diagnosis;
D O I
10.1109/TSMCA.2005.853503
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
By decentralized diagnosis we mean diagnosis using multiple diagnosers, each possessing its own set of sensors, without involving any communication among diagnosers or to any coordinators. The notion of decentralized diagnosis is formalized by introducing the notion of codiagnosability that requires that a failure be detected by one of the diagnosers within a bounded delay. Algorithms of complexity polynomial in the size of the system and the nonfault specification are provided for: 1) testing codiagnosability, 2) computing the bound in delay of diagnosis, 3) offline synthesis of individual diagnosers, and 4) online diagnosis using them. The notion of codiagnosability and the above algorithms are initially presented in a setting of a specification language (violation of which represents a fault) and are later specialized to the case where faults are modeled as the occurrences of certain events. The notion of strong codiagnosability is also introduced to capture the ability of being certain about both the failure as well as the nonfailure conditions in a system within a bounded delay.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 395
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decentralized failure diagnosis in discrete event systems
    Athanasopoulou, Eleftheria
    Hadjicostis, Christoforos N.
    [J]. 2006 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2006, 1-12 : 576 - +
  • [2] Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems
    Debouk, R
    Lafortune, S
    Teneketzis, D
    [J]. 1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, 1998, : 3010 - 3011
  • [3] Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems
    [J]. Debouk, Rami, 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (10):
  • [4] Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems
    Debouk, R
    Lafortune, S
    Teneketzis, D
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 37TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 3763 - 3768
  • [5] Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems
    Debouk, R
    Lafortune, S
    Teneketzis, D
    [J]. DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 10 (1-2): : 33 - 86
  • [6] Coordinated Decentralized Protocols for Failure Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems
    Rami Debouk
    Stéphane Lafortune
    Demosthenis Teneketzis
    [J]. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 2000, 10 : 33 - 86
  • [7] On the effect of communication delays in failure diagnosis of decentralized discrete event systems
    Debouk, R
    Lafortune, S
    Teneketzis, D
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 2000, : 2245 - 2251
  • [8] On the effect of communication delays in failure diagnosis of decentralized discrete event systems
    Debouk, R
    Lafortune, S
    Teneketzis, D
    [J]. DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 13 (03): : 263 - 289
  • [9] On the Effect of Communication Delays in Failure Diagnosis of Decentralized Discrete Event Systems
    Rami Debouk
    Stéphane Lafortune
    Demosthenis Teneketzis
    [J]. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 2003, 13 : 263 - 289
  • [10] Comments on "Polynomial Time Verification of Decentralized Diagnosability of Discrete Event Systems" versus "Decentralized Failure Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems": Complexity Clarification
    Kumar, Ratnesh
    Takai, Shigemasa
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2014, 59 (05) : 1391 - 1392