Investigating Grounded Conceptualization: Stimulus-Response Compatibility for Tool Handles Is Due to Spatial Attention

被引:9
|
作者
Matheson, Heath E. [1 ,2 ]
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Northern British Columbia, Dept Psychol, 3333 Univ Way, Prince George, BC, Canada
关键词
stimulus-response compatibility; affordance effect; embodied cognition; motor representations; TIME-COURSE; AFFORDANCE COMPATIBILITY; ACTION REPRESENTATIONS; GRASPING AFFORDANCE; EMBODIED-COGNITION; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SIMON-LIKE; BEER MUGS; OBJECTS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1037/xhp0000616
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Brain imaging research shows that viewing tools activates regions of the cortex implicated in performing actions with that tool. Grounded (or embodied) theories of cognition propose that this activity reflects the activation of motor representations that are constitutive of the object concept. Behaviorally, participants respond faster with the hand that is aligned with the handle of an object. This stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effect is often taken as evidence supporting the hypothesis that motor representations are activated in response to the visual presentation of tools during conceptual processing. To test this hypothesis, we trained participants to use a set of novel tools (manipulation group) or to report spatial information about the tools (spatial group) in preparation for a Martian archeological dig. We investigated compatibility effects in a conceptual judgment task and a visual discrimination task. Compatibility effects were observed for both groups regardless of experience. These effects were predicted by the salient parts of objects specified by task demands and not by motor experience with the objects. This result provides evidence that compatibility effects with tools reflect a general stimulus-response compatibly effect due to visual attention.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 457
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Direct Comparison of Spatial Attention and Stimulus-Response Compatibility between Mice and Humans
    Schnabel, Ulf H.
    Van der Bijl, Tobias
    Roelfsema, Pieter R.
    Lorteije, Jeannette A. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 33 (05) : 771 - 783
  • [2] ATTENTIONAL FOCUSING AND SPATIAL STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY
    STOFFER, TH
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1991, 53 (02): : 127 - 135
  • [3] Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and negative priming
    Read, LE
    Proctor, RW
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [4] Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and negative priming
    Lenore E. Read
    Robert W. Proctor
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004, 11 : 41 - 48
  • [5] Commentary on Stoffer and Umilta: Attention in stimulus-response compatibility
    Weeks, DJ
    Chua, R
    Bautista, A
    [J]. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY, 1997, 118 : 215 - 219
  • [6] Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility
    Cho, YS
    Proctor, RW
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2004, 66 (06): : 1003 - 1017
  • [7] Dissociable effects of auditory attention switching and stimulus-response compatibility
    Lawo, Vera
    Koch, Iring
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2014, 78 (03): : 379 - 386
  • [8] Temporal stimulus-response compatibility
    Grosjean, M
    Mordkoff, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (04) : 870 - 878
  • [9] Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition
    Verbruggen, F
    Liefooghe, B
    Notebaert, W
    Vandierendonck, A
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2005, 120 (03) : 307 - 326
  • [10] Compatibility in Stimulus-Response Coupling
    Weeks, D. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 : S3 - S3