Robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair and transversus abdominis release: short-term outcomes and risk factors associated with perioperative complications

被引:24
|
作者
Gokcal, F. [1 ]
Morrison, S. [1 ]
Kudsi, O. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Good Samaritan Med Ctr, One Pear St, Brockton, MA 02301 USA
关键词
Robot-assisted laparoscopy; Ventral hernia repair; Transversus abdominis release; Incisional hernia; Retromuscular; Retrorectus; Rives-Stoppa; Sublay; POSTERIOR COMPONENT SEPARATION; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR; MUSCLE RELEASE; CLASSIFICATION; RECURRENCE; GROIN;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-019-01911-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Retromuscular ventral hernia repairs have become increasingly popular, both with and without transversus abdominis release. We aim to describe our 90-day outcomes in patients who underwent robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (RRVHR). Methods All patients were subcategorized into those who underwent a TAR (TAR+) as part of their repair, and those who did not (TAR-). Patient demographics, comorbidities, hernia characteristics, and LOS were studied. Perioperative complications were reviewed in four different time frames up to 90 days. All hernias and complications were classified using the recommended classification systems. Appropriate univariate analyses and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the hernia characteristics which required a TAR technique, and risk factors which associated with the development of complications. Results Of 454 robotic ventral hernia repairs, 101 patients who underwent RRVHR were included into the study. Of these, 54 patients underwent RRVHR with TAR while the remaining 47 patients underwent repair without TAR. Incisional hernias, off-midline locations, and larger size defects were factors that required the addition of a TAR. In 9.9% patients, an unplanned TAR was performed. Postoperative pain assessment was similar in both groups. LOS was significantly longer for TAR+group (p < 0.001). The median Comprehension Complication Index (R) score was 8.7 (range: 0-42.4) for all patients and was significantly higher for TAR+group (p = 0.014). Complications were higher in the TAR+group as compared to the TAR- group (p = 0.028), though this difference did not persist in follow-up. Most complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo grade-I and -II). The development of complications was only associated with the presence of an incarcerated hernia at repair. Conclusion RRVHR is safe and feasible. 9.9% of our cohort required a TAR that was unplanned, particularly incisional hernias. TAR patients may be more prone to complications in the immediate post-operative period, however, the difference between patients with and without TAR adjuncts resolved at 90 days.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 385
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair and transversus abdominis release: short-term outcomes and risk factors associated with perioperative complications
    F. Gokcal
    S. Morrison
    O. Y. Kudsi
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 375 - 385
  • [2] Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis
    U. Bracale
    F. Corcione
    D. Neola
    S. Castiglioni
    G. Cavallaro
    C. Stabilini
    E. Botteri
    M. Sodo
    N. Imperatore
    R. Peltrini
    Hernia, 2021, 25 : 1471 - 1480
  • [3] Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Bracale, U.
    Corcione, F.
    Neola, D.
    Castiglioni, S.
    Cavallaro, G.
    Stabilini, C.
    Botteri, E.
    Sodo, M.
    Imperatore, N.
    Peltrini, R.
    HERNIA, 2021, 25 (06) : 1471 - 1480
  • [4] Comment to: transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis
    M. Dewulf
    D. De Bacquer
    F. Muysoms
    Hernia, 2022, 26 : 1211 - 1212
  • [5] Comment to: transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Dewulf, M.
    De Bacquer, D.
    Muysoms, F.
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (04) : 1211 - 1212
  • [6] Robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repairs
    Nguyen, Tiffany
    Kunes, Kristina
    Crigler, Christine
    Ballecer, Conrad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY, 2022, 5 (03) : 103 - 109
  • [7] Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair
    Bittner, James G.
    Alrefai, Sameer
    Vy, Michelle
    Mabe, Micah
    Del Prado, Paul A. R.
    Clingempeel, Natasha L.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (02): : 727 - 734
  • [8] Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair
    James G. Bittner
    Sameer Alrefai
    Michelle Vy
    Micah Mabe
    Paul A. R. Del Prado
    Natasha L. Clingempeel
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 727 - 734
  • [9] Hybrid robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release versus open transversus abdominis release: a comparison of short-term outcomes
    Halka, J. T.
    Vasyluk, A.
    Demare, A.
    Iacco, A.
    Janczyk, R.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [10] Hybrid robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release versus open transversus abdominis release: a comparison of short-term outcomes
    J. T. Halka
    A. Vasyluk
    A. Demare
    A. Iacco
    R. Janczyk
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 37 - 42