OBVIOUS AND HIDDEN FEATURES OF CORPORATE DEFAULT IN BANKRUPTCY MODELS

被引:10
|
作者
Kubenka, Michal [1 ]
Myskova, Renata [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pardubice, Fac Econ & Adm, Inst Business Econ & Management, Studentska 95, Pardubice 53210, Czech Republic
关键词
corporate default; bankrupt models; financial distress; prediction accuracy; DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS; FINANCIAL RATIOS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3846/jbem.2019.9612
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to prove the key role of the structure of the research sample used for accuracy determining on the accuracy of bankruptcy models. The creators of these models report the accuracy usually in the range of 60 to 90%. The authors of this article claim that these values are inaccurate and misleading. The real I. type error should be detected on a sample where obvious features of financial default were eliminated. The research tested more than 1200 of thriving businesses and also 270 businesses in future bankruptcy. The research has determined real current accuracy of selected three bankruptcy models on the standard sample of Czech businesses amounting 67.77%, 62.27% and 74.36%. This confirmed hypothesis no. 1, which says that actual accuracy of bankruptcy model is lower than original accuracy indicated by model makers. An accuracy of 58.70%, 61.59% and 65.94% was measured on a sample where businesses with obvious features of financial distress were eliminated. Due to the modification of the test sample, the order of accuracy has changed. This confirmed hypothesis no. 2. The Index of Karas and Reznakova reached the highest overall accuracy of 80.31% including incorrect prediction of bankruptcy also.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 383
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TIME POSTPONENTS OF CLASSICAL CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY MODELS
    Camska, Dagmar
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2017, : 264 - 272
  • [2] 'Blind' to the obvious: Wittgenstein and Kohler on the obvious and the hidden
    Dinishak, Janette
    [J]. HISTORY OF THE HUMAN SCIENCES, 2014, 27 (04) : 59 - 76
  • [3] AdaBoost Models for Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction with Missing Data
    Ligang Zhou
    Kin Keung Lai
    [J]. Computational Economics, 2017, 50 : 69 - 94
  • [4] Symmetric and asymmetric binary choice models for corporate bankruptcy
    Golet, Ionut
    [J]. CHALLENGES AND INNOVATIONS IN MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM IN MANAGEMENT, 2014, 124 : 282 - 291
  • [5] AdaBoost Models for Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction with Missing Data
    Zhou, Ligang
    Lai, Kin Keung
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 50 (01) : 69 - 94
  • [6] BANKRUPTCY MODELS: VERIFYING THEIR VALIDITY AS A PREDICTOR OF CORPORATE FAILURE
    Kovacova, M.
    Kliestik, T.
    Kubala, P.
    Valaskova, K.
    Radisic, M.
    Borocki, J.
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2018, 18 (01): : 167 - 179
  • [7] Benchmarking machine learning models to predict corporate bankruptcy
    Alanis, Emmanuel
    Chava, Sudheer
    Shah, Agam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CREDIT RISK, 2023, 19 (02): : 77 - 110
  • [8] Analysis of default data using hidden Markov models
    Giampieri, G
    Davis, M
    Crowder, M
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2005, 5 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [9] Corporate credit default models: A mixed logit approach
    Kukuk M.
    Rönnberg M.
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2013, 40 (3) : 467 - 483
  • [10] Additive Intensity Regression Models in Corporate Default Analysis
    Lando, David
    Medhat, Mamdouh
    Nielsen, Mads Stenbo
    Nielsen, Soren Feodor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2013, 11 (03) : 443 - 485