共 50 条
Enantioselective analysis of atenolol in biologic fluids: comparison of liquid-liquid and solid-phase extraction methods
被引:21
|作者:
Iha, MH
Martinez, AS
Bonato, PS
[1
]
机构:
[1] USP, Dept Quim & Fis, Fac Ciencias Farmaceut Ribeirao Preto, BR-14040903 Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[2] Inst Adolfo Lutz Registro, Lab Ribeirao Preto 1, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[3] USP, Dept Quim, Fac Filosofia Ciencias & Letras Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[4] USP, Dept Fis & Matemat, Fac Filosofia Ciencias & Letras Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
来源:
基金:
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词:
enantiomer separation;
chiral stationary phases;
LC;
atenolol;
D O I:
10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00515-1
中图分类号:
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号:
071010 ;
081704 ;
摘要:
In this study we evaluated a liquid-liquid extraction procedure and a solid-phase extraction procedure for sample preparation for the enantioselective analysis of atenolol in plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography. A Chiralcel OD-H column was used for the resolution of atenolol enantiomers; with hexane-ethanol (85:15, v/v) plus 0.1% diethylamine as the mobile phase. In the liquid-liquid extraction procedure, atenolol was extracted from alkalinized body fluids with 5 ml chloroform-2-propanol (4:1, v/v). In the solid-phase extraction procedure, atenolol was isolated from plasma using a C-8 column and methanol. Both extraction procedures were efficient in recovering atenolol and removing endogenous interferents. The RSDs and deviation from nominal values were lower than 10% for both within-day and between-day assays. The results show that there were no statistically significant differences in between-day variation. The t-test showed that there were no significant differences between the real concentrations and the determined concentrations. The limit of quantitation was 10 ng/ml and the linear range was 10-5000 ng/ml for both methods. These methods can be used in pharmacokinetic studies. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science BY. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文