Climate and health implications of future aerosol emission scenarios

被引:32
|
作者
Partanen, Antti-Ilari [1 ,2 ]
Landry, Jean-Sebastien [1 ,3 ]
Matthews, H. Damon [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Geog Planning & Environm, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd West, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Climate Syst Res, POB 503, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Geomat Appl, 2500 Blvd Univ, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2018年 / 13卷 / 02期
基金
芬兰科学院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
anthropogenic aerosols; climate change; aerosol health effects; climate modeling; OUTDOOR AIR-POLLUTION; PREMATURE MORTALITY; GLOBAL MORTALITY; MODEL; TEMPERATURE; EXPOSURE; IMPACT; QUALITY; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/aaa511
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic aerosols have a net cooling effect on climate and also cause adverse health effects by degrading air quality. In this global-scale sensitivity study, we used a combination of the aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ and the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model to assess the climate and health effects of aerosols emissions from three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5) and two new (LOW and HIGH) aerosol emission scenarios derived from RCP4.5, but that span a wider spectrum of possible future aerosol emissions. All simulations had CO2 emissions and greenhouse gas forcings from RCP4.5. Aerosol forcing declined similarly in the standard RCP aerosol emission scenarios: the aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) decreased from -1.3 Wm(-2) in 2005 to between -0.1 Wm(-2) and -0.4 Wm(-2) in 2100. The differences in ERF were substantially larger between LOW (-0.02 Wm(-2) in 2100) and HIGH (-0.8 Wm(-2)) scenarios. The global mean temperature difference between the simulations with standard RCP aerosol emissions was less than 0.18 degrees C, whereas the difference between LOW and HIGH reached 0.86 degrees C in 2061. In LOW, the rate of warming peaked at 0.48 degrees C per decade in the 2030s, whereas in HIGH it was the lowest of all simulations and never exceeded 0.23 degrees C per decade. Using present-day population density and baseline mortality rates for all scenarios, PM2.5-induced premature mortality was 2 371 800 deaths per year in 2010 and 525 700 in 2100 with RCP4.5 aerosol emissions; in HIGH, the premature mortality reached its maximum value of 2 780 800 deaths per year in 2030, whereas in LOW the premature mortality at 2030 was below 299 900 deaths per year. Our results show potential trade-offs in aerosol mitigation with respect to climate change and public health as ambitious reduction of aerosol emissions considerably increased warming while decreasing mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Changes in future air quality, deposition, and aerosol-cloud interactions under future climate and emission scenarios
    Glotfelty, Timothy
    Zhang, Yang
    Karamchandani, Prakash
    Streets, David G.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 139 : 176 - 191
  • [2] Understanding of Aerosol–Climate Interactions in China: Aerosol Impacts on Solar Radiation, Temperature, Cloud, and Precipitation and Its Changes Under Future Climate and Emission Scenarios
    Song Liu
    Jia Xing
    Bin Zhao
    Jiandong Wang
    Shuxiao Wang
    Xiaoye Zhang
    Aijun Ding
    [J]. Current Pollution Reports, 2019, 5 : 36 - 51
  • [3] Understanding of Aerosol-Climate Interactions in China: Aerosol Impacts on Solar Radiation, Temperature, Cloud, and Precipitation and Its Changes Under Future Climate and Emission Scenarios
    Liu, Song
    Xing, Jia
    Zhao, Bin
    Wang, Jiandong
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Zhang, Xiaoye
    Ding, Aijun
    [J]. CURRENT POLLUTION REPORTS, 2019, 5 (02) : 36 - 51
  • [4] Aerosol effect on climate extremes in Europe under different future scenarios
    Sillmann, J.
    Pozzoli, L.
    Vignati, E.
    Kloster, S.
    Feichter, J.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (10) : 2290 - 2295
  • [5] Future changes in Beijing haze events under different anthropogenic aerosol emission scenarios
    Zhang, Lixia
    Wilcox, Laura J.
    Dunstone, Nick J.
    Paynter, David J.
    Hu, Shuai
    Bollasina, Massimo
    Li, Donghuan
    Shonk, Jonathan K. P.
    Zou, Liwei
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 21 (10) : 7499 - 7514
  • [6] Urban climate change adaptation: Exploring the implications of future land cover scenarios
    Carter, Jeremy G.
    [J]. CITIES, 2018, 77 : 73 - 80
  • [7] Analysis of future climate scenarios for northeastern Brazil and implications for human thermal comfort
    Costa, Rafaela L.
    Baptista, Gustavo M. M.
    Gomes, HeliofAbio B.
    Silva, FabrIcio D. S.
    Da Rocha Junior, Rodrigo L.
    Nedel, Anderson S.
    [J]. ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2021, 93 (01): : 1 - 23
  • [8] Climate change and its health implications now and in the future
    Karoly, D.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 60 : 4 - 4
  • [9] Emission scenarios and global climate protection
    Alcamo, J
    Kreileman, E
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1996, 6 (04): : 305 - 334
  • [10] Future Climate Change Under SSP Emission Scenarios With GISS-E2.1
    Nazarenko, Larissa S.
    Tausnev, Nick
    Russell, Gary L.
    Rind, David
    Miller, Ron L.
    Schmidt, Gavin A.
    Bauer, Susanne E.
    Kelley, Maxwell
    Ruedy, Reto
    Ackerman, Andrew S.
    Aleinov, Igor
    Bauer, Michael
    Bleck, Rainer
    Canuto, Vittorio
    Cesana, Gregory
    Cheng, Ye
    Clune, Thomas L.
    Cook, Ben I.
    Cruz, Carlos A.
    Del Genio, Anthony D.
    Elsaesser, Gregory S.
    Faluvegi, Greg
    Kiang, Nancy Y.
    Kim, Daehyun
    Lacis, Andrew A.
    Leboissetier, Anthony
    LeGrande, Allegra N.
    Lo, Ken K.
    Marshall, John
    Matthews, Elaine E.
    McDermid, Sonali
    Mezuman, Keren
    Murray, Lee T.
    Oinas, Valdar
    Orbe, Clara
    Garcia-Pando, Carlos Perez
    Perlwitz, Jan P.
    Puma, Michael J.
    Romanou, Anastasia
    Shindell, Drew T.
    Sun, Shan
    Tsigaridis, Kostas
    Tselioudis, George
    Weng, Ensheng
    Wu, Jingbo
    Yao, Mao-Sung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2022, 14 (07)