Male and Female Parole Decisions: Is Paying Your Dues or Saying You're Sorry More Important?

被引:2
|
作者
Estrada-Reynolds, Victoria C. [1 ]
Schweitzer, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Nunez, Narina [1 ]
Culhane, Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Psychol, 1000 E Univ Ave,Dept 3415, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
decision-making; down payment effect; economic reparations; emotional reparations; gender; legal decisions; remorse; RESTORATIVE JUSTICE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; EMOTION RECOGNITION; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; DEFENDANT REMORSE; VICTIMS; RESPONSES; CRIME; NEED;
D O I
10.1080/13218719.2016.1164640
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Researchers have suggested that females and males consider different factors when making legal decisions; females consider offender remorse more whereas males consider more tangible punishments, such as serving time. The current study investigates gender differences when making legal decisions. The participants (n = 596) read one of three parole scenarios (armed robbery, arson, or drug trafficking) where inmate remorse and time served were manipulated, and decided whether to grant or deny parole. The results show that the participants were less likely to grant parole to the armed robbery inmate, followed by arson and drug trafficking. Additionally, time served affected decisions more consistently than remorse shown, regardless of participant gender. Contrary to hypotheses, women rated the inmates more positively when they had served the majority of their time. The current study suggests that time served is an important predictor of decisions, and that remorse may not be enough to make people agree to reduce punishment or grant freedom.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 907
页数:15
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据