Effects of grazing dates on forage and beef production of mixed prairie rangeland

被引:3
|
作者
Schellenberg, MP [1 ]
Holt, NW [1 ]
Waddington, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Semiarid Prairie Agr Res Ctr, Swift Current, SK S9H 3X2, Canada
关键词
mixed grass prairie; crested wheatgrass; grazing; weather effects;
D O I
10.4141/A98-066
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Conventional belief is that mixed prairie range is harmed by early spring use but not by moderate grazing after the grasses have flowered. Our hypothesis was that mixed prairie range may be grazed for a limited period in the growing season providing rest is allowed for the remainder of the year. This 6-yr test was established on a rolling site of range pasture, which contained, by area, 65% upland mixed prairie, 5% lowland bluegrass (Poa spp.) and 30% crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum). The species mix is commonly found in southern Canadian prairies. The mixed prairie grasses were needle and thread (Stipa comata), northern wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolatus), western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) and blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis). Each pasture was 1.6 ha and was grazed with yearling beef cattle once a year beginning mid-May; the end of June; mid-August or late September. Forage yields in grazing-exclusion cages averaged 580, 2960, and 1370 kg ha(-1) for the mixed prairie, lowland grasses, and crested wheatgrass, respectively. The date of grazing in the previous year did not affect current-year maximum forage yield. The main determinant of maximum forage yield was a combination of spring soil moisture plus April to June precipitation. Available forage for grazing, on average, doubled from mid-May until the end of June for the three forage types. There were year-by-grazing date interactions, which were related to distribution of precipitation. Mixed prairie was the preferred forage at the last two grazing dates. Forage digestibility, N and P content were highest during the May and June grazing period and declined thereafter. Average daily gain of the steers decreased from 0.9 kg d(-1) in May and late June to 0.2 kg d(-1) by late September. Annual carrying capacity (in standard animal units) was 40 d hal in May and averaged 55 d ha(-1) for the other dates, which were not different. Grazing mixed prairie did not have a negative effect on the yield of native grasses when used for only one short period per year. Delayed use from mid May to end of June increased available forage and carrying capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 341
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forage intake by and site and extent of digestion in beef cattle grazing midgrass prairie rangeland or plains bluestem pasture throughout the summer
    Gunter, SA
    McCollum, FT
    Gillen, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1997, 75 (02) : 490 - 501
  • [2] BEEF AND FORAGE PRODUCTION ON CONTOUR FURROWED RANGELAND INTERSEEDED WITH ALFALFA
    KARTCHNER, RJ
    WIGHT, JR
    BISHOP, JL
    BELLOWS, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1983, 36 (04): : 479 - 482
  • [3] FORAGE INTAKE AND DIGESTION BY CATTLE GRAZING MIDGRASS PRAIRIE RANGELAND OR SIDEOATS GRAMA SWEETCLOVER PASTURE
    GUNTER, SA
    MCCOLLUM, FT
    GILLEN, RL
    KRYSL, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1993, 71 (12) : 3432 - 3441
  • [4] Effects of encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on performance and methane production of beef steers grazing mixed winter forage
    Doblado, Andrea M. Osorio
    Mejia-Turcios, Sebastian E.
    Stotz, Miranda K.
    Vargas, David
    de Araujo, Rafael Canonenco
    DiLorenzo, Nicolas
    Henry, Francine
    Sarturi, Jhones Onorino
    Henry, Darren D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 166 - 166
  • [5] PREGNANCY AND LACTATION IN BEEF HEIFERS GRAZING TALLGRASS PRAIRIE IN THE WINTER - INFLUENCE ON INTAKE, FORAGE UTILIZATION, AND GRAZING BEHAVIOR
    VANZANT, ES
    COCHRAN, RC
    JOHNSON, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1991, 69 (07) : 3027 - 3038
  • [6] CHANGES IN VEGETATION AND PRODUCTION OF FORAGE RESULTING FROM GRAZING LOWLAND PRAIRIE
    WEAVER, JE
    DARLAND, RW
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1948, 29 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [7] GRAZING BEHAVIOR OF RANGELAND BEEF-COWS DIFFERING IN MILK-PRODUCTION
    LATHROP, WJ
    KRESS, DD
    HAVSTAD, KM
    DOORNBOS, DE
    AYERS, EL
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1988, 21 (04) : 315 - 327
  • [8] The effects of traditional grazing practices on upland (yayla) rangeland vegetation and forage quality
    Comakli, Binali
    Dasci, Mahmut
    Koc, Ali
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2008, 32 (04) : 259 - 265
  • [9] Effects of grazing on restoration of southern mixed prairie soils
    Fuhlendorf, SD
    Zhang, H
    Tunnell, TR
    Engle, DM
    Cross, AF
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2002, 10 (02) : 401 - 407
  • [10] FORAGE INTAKE OF ALPACAS GRAZING ANDEAN RANGELAND IN PERU
    REINER, RJ
    BRYANT, FC
    FARFAN, RD
    CRADDOCK, BF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1987, 64 (03) : 868 - 871