Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Risk-Factor Guided and Birth-Cohort Screening for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in the United States

被引:54
|
作者
Liu, Shan [1 ]
Cipriano, Lauren E. [1 ]
Holodniy, Mark [2 ]
Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford Hlth Policy, Ctr Hlth Policy & Primary Care, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Stanford Hlth Policy, Ctr Outcomes Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VIRUS-INFECTION; VIROLOGICAL RESPONSE; VIRAL-HEPATITIS; ALL-CAUSE; POPULATION; MORTALITY; PEGINTERFERON; UTILITIES; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0058975
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: No consensus exists on screening to detect the estimated 2 million Americans unaware of their chronic hepatitis C infections. Advisory groups differ, recommending birth-cohort screening for baby boomers, screening only high-risk individuals, or no screening. We assessed one-time risk assessment and screening to identify previously undiagnosed 40-74 year-olds given newly available hepatitis C treatments. Methods and Findings: A Markov model evaluated alternative risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening and treatment strategies. Risk factors included drug use history, blood transfusion before 1992, and multiple sexual partners. Analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provided sex-, race-, age-, and risk-factor-specific hepatitis C prevalence and mortality rates. Nine strategies combined screening (no screening, risk-factor guided screening, or birth-cohort screening) and treatment (standard therapy-peginterferon alfa and ribavirin, Interleukin-28B-guided (IL28B) triple-therapy-standard therapy plus a protease inhibitor, or universal triple therapy). Response-guided treatment depended on HCV genotype. Outcomes include discounted lifetime costs (2010 dollars) and quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). Compared to no screening, risk-factor guided and birth-cohort screening for 50 year-olds gained 0.7 to 3.5 quality adjusted life-days and cost $168 to $568 per person. Birth-cohort screening provided more benefit per dollar than risk-factor guided screening and cost $65,749 per QALY if followed by universal triple therapy compared to screening followed by IL28B-guided triple therapy. If only 10% of screen-detected, eligible patients initiate treatment at each opportunity, birth-cohort screening with universal triple therapy costs $241,100 per QALY. Assuming treatment with triple therapy, screening all individuals aged 40-64 years costs less than $100,000 per QALY. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of one-time birth-cohort hepatitis C screening for 40-64 year olds is comparable to other screening programs, provided that the healthcare system has sufficient capacity to deliver prompt treatment and appropriate follow-on care to many newly screen-detected individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in the United States
    Eckman, Mark H.
    Gordon, Stuart C.
    Talal, Andrew
    Schiff, Eugene R.
    Sherman, Kenneth E.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 56 : 261A - 261A
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in the United States
    Eckman, Mark H.
    Talal, Andrew H.
    Gordon, Stuart C.
    Schiff, Eugene
    Sherman, Kenneth E.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 56 (10) : 1382 - 1393
  • [3] The Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Chronic Hepatitis B Infection in the United States
    Eckman, Mark H.
    Kaiser, Tiffany E.
    Sherman, Kenneth E.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 52 (11) : 1294 - 1306
  • [4] The Cost-Effectiveness of Birth-Cohort Screening for Hepatitis C Antibody in US Primary Care Settings
    Rein, David B.
    Smith, Bryce D.
    Wittenborn, John S.
    Lesesne, Sarah B.
    Wagner, Laura D.
    Roblin, Douglas W.
    Patel, Nita
    Ward, John W.
    Weinbaum, Cindy M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 156 (04) : 263 - U24
  • [5] ASSESSING THE IMPORTANCE OF FIBROSIS STAGE ON THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF BIRTH-COHORT VERSUS RISK-BASED SCREENING AND TREATMENT FOR HEPATITIS C VIRUS INFECTION
    McEwan, P.
    Ward, T.
    Yuan, Y.
    L'Italien, G.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A186 - A187
  • [6] The cost-effectiveness of hepatitis A vaccination in patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection in the United States
    Arguedas, MR
    Heudebert, GR
    Fallon, MB
    Stinnett, AA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (03): : 721 - 728
  • [7] A Review and Summary Analysis of Major Studies of the Cost-effectiveness Birth Cohort Testing for Hepatitis C in United States
    Rein, David B.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 58 : 391A - 391A
  • [8] A cost-effectiveness analysis of universal hepatitis C screening in all United States pregnancies
    Susich, Marguerite
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Greiner, Karen
    Chaiken, Sarina R.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 7381 - 7388
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of Universal and Targeted Hepatitis C Virus Screening in the United States
    Tatar, Moosa
    Keeshin, Susana W.
    Mailliard, Mark
    Wilson, Fernando A.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (09)
  • [10] The Impact of Timing and Prioritization on the Cost-Effectiveness of Birth Cohort Testing and Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus in the United States
    McEwan, Phil
    Ward, Thomas
    Yuan, Yong
    Kim, Ray
    L'Italien, Gilbert
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 58 (01) : 54 - 64