Hemodynamic and antiarrhythmic effects of lidocaine or amiodarone in dogs anesthetized with halothane

被引:1
|
作者
Moro, J. V. [1 ]
Nunes, N. [1 ]
Barbosa, V. F. [1 ]
Thiesen, R. [1 ]
Lopes, P. C. F. [1 ]
Belmonte, E. A. [1 ]
Borges, P. A. [1 ]
Batista, P. A. C. S. [1 ]
Costa, P. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] UNESP, FCAV, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
canine; antiarrhythmogenicity; anesthesia; INTRAVENOUS AMIODARONE; EPINEPHRINE; METABOLISM;
D O I
10.1590/S0102-09352013000400011
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The effects of continuous rate infusion of lidocaine or amiodarone on hemodynamic and arrhythmias induced by epinephrine in dogs anesthetized with halothane were evaluated. Thirty dogs were distributed into three groups: amiodarone group (AG), lidocaine group (LG), or control group (CG). Anesthesia was induced with etomidate and maintained with halothane. Thirty minutes later a bolus and continuous rate infusion (CRI) of amiodarone in AG, lidocaine in LG and NaCl at 0.9% in CG was administered. After 10 minutes, arrhythmias were induced by epinephrine CRI at 0.0001mg/kg/minute, which was increased in 0.0001mg/kg/minute every ten minutes, until 0.0003mg/kg/minute. The measurements were performed 30 minutes after the induction of anesthesia (T0), 10 minutes after beginning the drug CRIs (T1), 10 minutes after beginning epinephrine administration (T2) and 10 minutes after increasing epinephrine CRI (T3 and T4). In CG, at T3 heart rate (HR) was greater than in LG, while at T4, HR in GC was higher than in LG and AG. In LG and CG, from T2, central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac index (CI), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) increased. In AG, SAP, DAP and MAP it decreased from T1 to T3. The ventricular ectopic beats (VEB) were lower in AG. Amiodarone has better antiarrhythmogenic effects, although it was also associated with hypotension.
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1016
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF AMIODARONE IN ANESTHETIZED DOGS
    MOSCA, SM
    GELPI, RJ
    CINGOLANI, HE
    [J]. MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 1981, 41 (06) : 715 - 716
  • [2] ANTIARRHYTHMIC AND HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES TO ADENOSINE-TRIPHOSPHATE DURING INFUSION OF EPINEPHRINE IN DOGS ANESTHETIZED WITH HALOTHANE
    SOHN, YZ
    HONG, JC
    KATZ, RL
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1982, 61 (05): : 423 - 429
  • [3] HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES TO NIFEDIPINE IN DOGS ANESTHETIZED WITH HALOTHANE
    TOSONE, SR
    REVES, JG
    KISSIN, I
    SMITH, LR
    FOURNIER, SE
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1983, 62 (10): : 903 - 908
  • [4] HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF CLONIDINE INJECTED EPIDURALLY IN HALOTHANE-ANESTHETIZED DOGS
    GHIGNONE, M
    CALVILLO, O
    QUINTIN, L
    CAPLE, S
    KOZODY, R
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1987, 34 (01): : 46 - 50
  • [5] HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF HALOTHANE IN DOGS
    HUGHES, R
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1973, 45 (05) : 416 - 421
  • [6] Effects of pericardial lidocaine on hemodynamic parameters and responses in dogs anesthetized with midazolam and fentanyl
    Takada, Motoshi
    Dohi, Shuji
    Akamatsu, Shigeru
    Suzuki, Akira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2007, 21 (03) : 393 - 399
  • [7] HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES TO ALFENTANIL IN HALOTHANE-ANESTHETIZED DOGS
    KIEN, ND
    REITAN, JA
    WHITE, DA
    WU, CH
    EISELE, JH
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1986, 65 (07): : 765 - 770
  • [8] THE HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF HIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATORY VENTILATION IN HALOTHANE ANESTHETIZED DOGS
    BEDNARSKI, RM
    MUIR, WW
    [J]. VETERINARY SURGERY, 1987, 16 (04) : 318 - 318
  • [9] DIPHENYLHYDANTOIN AND LIDOCAINE MODIFICATION OF AV CONDUCTION IN HALOTHANE-ANESTHETIZED DOGS
    ATLEE, JL
    HOMER, LD
    TOBEY, RE
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1975, 43 (01) : 49 - 60
  • [10] Hemodynamic effects of interpleural lidocaine and bupivacaine combination in anesthetized dogs with and without an open pericardium
    Bernard, F
    Kudnig, ST
    Monnet, E
    [J]. VETERINARY SURGERY, 2006, 35 (03) : 252 - 258