A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships

被引:104
|
作者
Mainardes, Emerson Wagner
Alves, Helena [1 ]
Raposo, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] UBI, Management & Econ Dept, Covilha, Portugal
关键词
Stakeholder; Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder management; Stakeholder importance; Stakeholder influence; Stakeholder relationships; Universities' stakeholders; Stakeholder analysis; Management theory; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; SALIENCE; FIRM; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/00251741211279648
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to develop a new model of stakeholder classification and a model for explaining the relationship between the organization and its respective stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach - The new proposed model is based on an empirical study that comprises an exploratory study based on 15 interviews and a confirmatory study based on 684 questionnaires answered by staff of 11 public universities. The main variable deployed is the stakeholder's respective level of influence from the organization's management perspective, that is, their level of legitimacy, power and urgency. Findings - The new model proposes six stakeholder types (regulator, controller, partner, passive, dependent and non-stakeholder). To explain the relationship between the stakeholder and the organization, the traditional needs-satisfaction vision was expanded. The variables of relevance, mutual influence and participation were found to be important in explaining the organization and stakeholder relationship. This study contributes both in simplifying stakeholder classification and in explaining the relationships between parties. Research limitations/implications - The study proposes a new model for stakeholder classification based on empirical research carried out with public organizations, therefore it is advisable to test this new classification scheme with other types of organizations. Originality/value - This research proposes a stakeholder classification scheme previously unpublished in the literature, which helps organizations managing the relationships with their stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:1861 / 1879
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Smart City Stakeholder Classification Model
    Van der Hoogen, Anthea
    Scholtz, Brenda
    Calitz, Andre
    [J]. 2019 CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (ICTAS), 2019,
  • [2] Defining stakeholder relationships
    Lawson, HW
    [J]. COMPUTER, 1999, 32 (03) : 110 - 112
  • [3] Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: A classification model
    Stocker, Fabricio
    de Arruda, Michelle P.
    de Mascena, Keysa M. C.
    Boaventura, Joao M. G.
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (05) : 2071 - 2080
  • [4] A FOCUS ON COMPANY-STAKEHOLDER RELATIONSHIPS IN THE LIGHT OF THE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
    Caputo, Francesco
    [J]. INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS, 2016, : 455 - 470
  • [5] Stakeholder relationships: the dialogue of engagement
    Foster, David
    Jonker, Jan
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2005, 5 (05): : 51 - +
  • [6] Stakeholder Relationships and Organizational Resilience
    Liu, Yuhuan
    Yin, Juelin
    [J]. MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2020, 16 (05) : 986 - 990
  • [7] Stakeholder relationships in higher education
    Kettunen J.
    [J]. Tertiary Education and Management, 2015, 21 (1) : 56 - 65
  • [8] Firm religiosity, bounded stakeholder salience, and stakeholder relationships in family firms
    Fang, Hanqinq
    Randolph, Robert Van de Graaff
    Chrisman, James J.
    Barnett, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SPIRITUALITY & RELIGION, 2013, 10 (03) : 253 - 270
  • [9] Towards the relational corporation: from managing stakeholder relationships to building stakeholder relationships (waiting for Copernicus)
    Lozano, Josep M.
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2005, 5 (02): : 60 - +
  • [10] The Stakeholder Model Refined
    Yves Fassin
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 84 : 113 - 135