Literature Review Robotic-Assisted Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Flap for Breast Reconstruction

被引:12
|
作者
Khan, Mustafa T. A. [1 ,4 ]
Won, Brian Wong [2 ]
Baumgardner, Kyle [1 ]
Lue, Melinda [1 ]
Montorfano, Lisandro [3 ]
Hosein, Rayaad C. C. [2 ]
Wang, Howard T. T. [2 ]
Martinez, Roberto A. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Dept Gen Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Dept Surg, Gen Surg Residency Program, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
deep inferior epigastric perforator; breast reconstruction; free flap; robotic surgery; DONOR-SITE MORBIDITY; PERFORATOR FLAP; DIEP; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003326
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionRobotic-assisted surgery is gaining popularity because of reported improvement in aesthetic outcomes while reducing the occurrence of complications compared with conventional surgical methods. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvesting has a long track record as a viable procedure for autologous reconstruction of the breast. In this literature review, we describe the feasibility of using the robotic platform in DIEP flap harvest.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology was to guide the literature review. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from inception to June 6, 2022. The Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords used to conduct this search are as described: "Robotic AND deep inferior epigastric perforator AND Breast reconstruction."ResultsSeven publications, detailing a total of 56 robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest procedures, were selected for review. Four publications used the transabdominal preperitoneal approach, whereas 2 exclusively used a totally extraperitoneal approach, and 1 compared the 2 approaches. The measured outcomes included technical feasibility of flap harvest in cadavers, viable flap harvest in live patients, harvest time and pedicle dissection time, pedicle length, fascial incision length, donor site pain, need for postoperative narcotic, donor site morbidity, and hernia formation. Overall, the reviewed articles demonstrated successful DIEP flap harvesting without the need for conversion to the conventional open procedure. Postoperative complications were minimal. Robotic DIEP flap harvest was shown to be safe and there were no reports of donor-site morbidity in the studies reviewed. The main advantages of the robotic approach include decreased postoperative pain and length of hospital stay, along with improved aesthetic outcomes. The main disadvantages are increased operative time and cost.ConclusionsAlthough at its current iteration, the robotic-assisted DIEP flap is feasible, it may not be practical in all settings. Furthermore, the true benefit of the robotic platform is yet to be determined, as more long-term studies are necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 708
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest for breast reconstruction
    Dayaratna, Nirmal
    Ahmadi, Nariman
    Mak, Cindy
    Dusseldorp, Joseph R.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (04) : 1072 - 1074
  • [2] Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap abdominal harvest for breast reconstruction: A case report
    Gundlapalli, Vinay S.
    Ogunleye, Adeyemi A.
    Scott, Kiandra
    Wenzinger, Eric
    Ulm, Jason P.
    Tavana, Lance
    Pullatt, Rana C.
    Delaney, Kevin O.
    MICROSURGERY, 2018, 38 (06) : 702 - 705
  • [3] Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest in breast reconstruction
    Daar, David A.
    Anzai, Lavinia M.
    Vranis, Neil M.
    Schulster, Michael L.
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Jun, Min
    Zhao, Lee C.
    Levine, Jamie P.
    MICROSURGERY, 2022, 42 (04) : 319 - 325
  • [4] Embracing Robotics in Microsurgery: Robotic-Assisted Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Choe, Joshua
    Aiello, Christopher
    Yom, Jina
    Minasian, Raquel A.
    Sugiyama, Gainosuke
    Smith, Mark L.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    Tanna, Neil
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2024,
  • [5] Learning Curve Analysis for Robotic-assisted Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap
    Moreira, Andrea
    Chen, Brian
    Bailey, Elizabeth
    Nelson, William
    Murariu, Daniel
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [6] Robotic Harvest of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction: A Case Series
    Bishop, Sarah N.
    Asaad, Malke
    Liu, Jun
    Chu, Carrie K.
    Clemens, Mark W.
    Kapur, Sahil S.
    Largo, Rene D.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 149 (05) : 1073 - 1077
  • [7] Robotic-assisted harvest of latissimus dorsi muscle flap for breast reconstruction: review of the literature
    Vourtsis, Spyridon A.
    Paspala, Anna
    Lykoudis, Panagis M.
    Spartalis, Eleftherios
    Tsourouflis, Gerasimos
    Dimitroulis, Dimitrios
    Pikoulis, Emmanouil
    Nikiteas, Nikolaos
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [8] Robotic-assisted harvest of latissimus dorsi muscle flap for breast reconstruction: review of the literature
    Spyridon A. Vourtsis
    Anna Paspala
    Panagis M. Lykoudis
    Eleftherios Spartalis
    Gerasimos Tsourouflis
    Dimitrios Dimitroulis
    Emmanouil Pikoulis
    Nikolaos Nikiteas
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 15 - 19
  • [9] The Expanding Utility of Robotic-Assisted Flap Harvest in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Roy, Nikita
    Alessandro, Christopher J. J.
    Ibelli, Taylor J. J.
    Akhavan, Arya A. A.
    Sharaf, Jake M. M.
    Rabinovitch, David
    Henderson, Peter W. W.
    Yao, Alice
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (15)
  • [10] Short Fasciotomy-Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Harvest for Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, Jisu
    Lee, Kyeong-Tae
    Mun, Goo-Hyun
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (06) : 972E - 984E