Analysis of the Structural Characteristics and Psychometric Properties of the Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire (PFBQ): A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Molina-Torres, Guadalupe [1 ]
Amiano-Lopez, Leticia [2 ]
Maria Cordoba-Pelaez, Marta [3 ]
Javier Ibanez-Vera, Alfonso [4 ]
Diaz-Mohedo, Esther [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Almeria, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing Physiotherapy & Med, Almeria 04120, Spain
[2] Competa Clin, Calle Carmen 9, Competa 29754, Spain
[3] FisioDomina Fisioterapia, Av Llano Pablo Picasso 26, Archidona 29300, Spain
[4] Univ Jaen, Dept Hlth Sci, Campus Lagunillas, Jaen 23071, Spain
[5] Univ Malaga, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Campus Teatinos, Malaga 29071, Spain
关键词
pelvic floor dysfunctions; questionnaire; validation; psychometric properties; cross-cultural adaptation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INCONTINENCE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; SHORT FORMS; WOMEN; VALIDATION; VERSION; RELIABILITY; SYMPTOMS; DISTRESS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11237075
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire is a validated and reliable questionnaire that studies the presence and degree of pelvic floor discomfort, providing a global vision of pelvic floor dysfunction. This questionnaire assesses urinary stress incontinence, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, urge urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapses, dysuria, dyspareunia, defecatory dysfunction, fecal incontinence, and the disability it causes to the respondent. Aim: The aim of the present study was to analyze the structural characteristics and psychometric properties of the different versions of the pelvic floor bother questionnaire, as well as the methodological quality, the quality of evidence, and the criteria used for good measurement properties. Methods: A systematic review was carried out in different databases, such as PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Dialnet, ScienceDirect, and CINAHL, on studies adapting and validating the pelvic floor bother questionnaire in other languages. The data were analyzed taking into account the guidelines of the preferred reporting item statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and following the COSMIN guidelines, considering articles published up to 28 February 2022, and registered in the PROSPERO database. Results: Initially, a total of 443 studies were found, from which a total of four studies were analyzed with regard to structural characteristics and psychometric properties, such as reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and criterion validity. Conclusions: The different versions of the questionnaires show basic structural characteristics and psychometric properties for the evaluation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions. Most of the analyzed versions present criteria for good measurement properties qualified as sufficient, inadequate-adequate methodological quality, and low-moderate quality of evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spanish Questionnaires for the Assessment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Women: A Systematic Review of the Structural Characteristics and Psychometric Properties
    Guallar-Bouloc, Marina
    Gomez-Bueno, Paloma
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
    Molina-Torres, Guadalupe
    Lomas-Vega, Rafael
    Galan-Mercant, Alejandro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (23)
  • [2] Analysis of Structural Characteristics and Psychometric Properties of the SarQoL® Questionnaire in Different Languages: A Systematic Review
    Martinez-Fernandez, Maria Visitacion
    Sandoval-Hernandez, Irene
    Galan-Mercant, Alejandro
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
    Martinez-Cal, Jesus
    Molina-Torres, Guadalupe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (08)
  • [3] VALIDATION OF A GLOBAL PELVIC FLOOR SYMPTOM BOTHER QUESTIONNAIRE
    Peterson, T. V.
    Karp, D. R.
    Aguilar, V. C.
    Davila, G. W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 : S90 - S90
  • [4] Validation of a global pelvic floor symptom bother questionnaire
    Peterson, Thais V.
    Karp, Deborah R.
    Aguilar, Vivian C.
    Davila, G. Willy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 (09) : 1129 - 1135
  • [5] Validation of a global pelvic floor symptom bother questionnaire
    Thais V. Peterson
    Deborah R. Karp
    Vivian C. Aguilar
    G. Willy Davila
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2010, 21 : 1129 - 1135
  • [6] Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pelvic floor bother questionnaire
    Thais Villela Peterson
    Rodrigo Ambar Pinto
    G. Willy Davila
    Sérgio Carlos Nahas
    Edmund Chada Baracat
    Jorge Milhem Haddad
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2019, 30 : 81 - 88
  • [7] Validation of a Chinese version for the global Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire
    Liu, Zhaoxue
    Zhou, Chengyu
    Munoz, Alvaro
    Zhang, Yingchun
    Li, Xuhong
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 305 (05) : 1353 - 1357
  • [8] Validation of an Arabic version of the global Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire
    Bazi, Tony
    Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar
    Ezzeddine, Dima
    Ayoub, Hajar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 121 (02) : 166 - 169
  • [9] Validation of a Chinese version for the global Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire
    Zhaoxue Liu
    Chengyu Zhou
    Alvaro Munoz
    Yingchun Zhang
    Xuhong Li
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 305 : 1353 - 1357
  • [10] Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pelvic floor bother questionnaire
    Peterson, Thais Villela
    Pinto, Rodrigo Ambar
    Davila, G. Willy
    Nahas, Sergio Carlos
    Baracat, Edmund Chada
    Haddad, Jorge Milhem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (01) : 81 - 88