Proxy advisory firms and stock option repricing

被引:22
|
作者
Larcker, David F. [1 ]
McCall, Allan L. [2 ]
Ormazabal, Gaizka [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford Grad Sch Business, Rock Ctr Corp Governance, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Navarra, IESE Business Sch, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS | 2013年 / 56卷 / 2-3期
关键词
Proxy advisory firms; Stock option repricing; Institutional shareholder voting; TURNOVER; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.05.003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the economic consequences associated with the board of director's choice of whether to adhere to proxy advisory firm policies in the design of stock option repricing programs. Proxy advisors provide research and voting recommendations to institutional investors on issues subject to a shareholder vote. Since many institutional investors follow the recommendations of proxy advisors in their voting, proxy advisor policies are an important consideration for corporate boards in the development of programs that require shareholder approval such as stock option repricing programs. Using a comprehensive sample of stock option repricings announced between 2004 and 2009, we find that repricing firms following the restrictive policies of proxy advisors exhibit statistically lower market reactions to the repricing, lower operating performance, and higher employee turnover. These results are consistent with the conclusion that proxy advisory firm recommendations regarding stock option repricings are not value increasing for shareholders. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 169
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Repricing and employee stock option valuation
    Corrado, CJ
    Jordan, BD
    Miller, TW
    Stansfield, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2001, 25 (06) : 1059 - 1082
  • [2] An examination of executive stock option repricing
    Carter, ME
    Lynch, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 61 (02) : 207 - 225
  • [3] The effect of stock option repricing on employee turnover
    Carter, ME
    Lynch, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2004, 37 (01): : 91 - 112
  • [4] Is Executive Stock Option Repricing a Red Flag?
    Hume, Evelyn C.
    Tokic, Damir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2005, 16 (06): : 61 - 69
  • [5] Employee stock option valuation with repricing features
    Leung, Kwai Sun
    Kwok, Yue Kuen
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2008, 8 (06) : 561 - 569
  • [6] Executive stock option repricing: Retention and performance reconsidered
    Daily, CM
    Certo, ST
    Dalton, DR
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 44 (04) : 8 - +
  • [7] Stock Option Repricing and Its Alternatives: An Empirical Examination
    Kalpathy, Swaminathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2009, 44 (06) : 1459 - 1487
  • [8] The timing of option repricing
    Callaghan, SR
    Saly, RJ
    Subramaniam, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2004, 59 (04): : 1651 - 1676
  • [9] Executive stock option repricing, internal governance mechanisms, and management turnover
    Chidambaran, NK
    Prabhala, NR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 69 (01) : 153 - 189
  • [10] Stock option repricing: Heads I win, tails you lose
    Arya, A
    Sun, HL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2004, 50 (04) : 297 - 312