Improving 3D water column seismic imaging using the Common Reflection Surface method

被引:7
|
作者
Rad, Parsa Bakhtiari [1 ]
Macelloni, Leonardo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Natl Ctr Phys Acoust NCPA, 145 Hill Dr Univ Campus, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Southern Mississippi, Hydrog Sci Res Ctr, Sch Ocean Sci & Engn, 1020 Balch Blvd, Stennis Space Ctr, MS 39529 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
CRS; Water column processing; 3D seismic imaging; Seismic oceanography;
D O I
10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104072
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Water column processing has gained attention in recent years since a seismic model of a water column could assist marine data processors to correctly image the sub-seafloor geology, which is the target of primary interest. In addition to seismic processing, water column imaging has gained interest in the physical oceanography community for improved study of oceanographic processes. However, seismic water column processing is challenging since the internal reflections of the ocean are inherently weak and are often masked by noise. In this work, we adopt the common reflection surface stack technique in order to improve the imaging of ocean water layers. The common reflection surface stack is a robust data preconditioning and stacking technique in seismic processing that relies on the kinematic wavefront attributes of seismic waves. The method is applied to a multichannel 3D data set collected for oil and gas exploration in the deep-water Gulf of Mexico. The method greatly improves inline sections but does not significantly enhance crosslines and horizontal slices, which are more sensitive to both the acquisition geometry and the temporal variability of ocean water masses. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultra-shallow imaging using 3D seismic-reflection methods
    Sloan, Steven D.
    Steeples, Don W.
    Tsoflias, Georgios P.
    [J]. NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 7 (5-6) : 307 - 314
  • [2] Fault imaging in sparsely sampled 3D seismic data using common-reflection-surface processing and attribute analysis - a study in the Upper Rhine Graben
    Buness, Hermann A.
    von Hartmann, Hartwig
    Rumpel, Hanna-Maria
    Krawczyk, Charlotte M.
    Schulz, Ruediger
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2014, 62 (03) : 443 - 452
  • [3] Fast 3D Ultra Shallow Seismic Reflection imaging using portable geophone mount
    Bachrach, R
    Mukerji, T
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (01) : 45 - 48
  • [4] A seismic reflection imaging workflow based on the common-reflection-surface stack
    Mann, J
    Duveneck, E
    Hertweck, T
    Jager, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEISMIC EXPLORATION, 2003, 12 (03): : 283 - 295
  • [5] The 3D Autojuggie: automating acquisition of 3D near-surface seismic reflection data
    Miller, Brian E.
    Sloan, Steven D.
    Tsoflias, Georgios P.
    Steeples, Don W.
    [J]. NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 15 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [6] 3D common-reflection-point-based seismic migration velocity analysis
    Fei, Weihong
    McMechan, George A.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (05) : S161 - S167
  • [7] A geometrical method for migrating 3D or 2.5D seismic reflection data
    Pivot, F
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1997, 24 (24) : 3321 - 3324
  • [8] 3D "Seismic Oceanography": The New Frontier in Ocean Water Column Exploration
    Macelloni, Leonardo
    [J]. OCEANOGRAPHY, 2019, 32 (01) : 127 - 127
  • [9] Broadband seismic imaging in 3D
    Cunnell, Chris
    [J]. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2014, 66 (09): : 42 - 47
  • [10] Imaging a medieval shipwreck with the new PingPong 3D marine reflection seismic system
    Wilken, Dennis
    Wunderlich, Tina
    Hollmann, Hannes
    Schwardt, Michaela
    Rabbel, Wolfgang
    Mohr, Clemens
    Schulte-Kortnack, Detlef
    Nakoinz, Oliver
    Enzmann, Jonas
    Juergens, Fritz
    Wilkes, Feiko
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2019, 26 (03) : 211 - 223