The course of depression in late life as measured by the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale in an observational study of hospitalized patients

被引:18
|
作者
Borza, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Engedal, Knut [3 ]
Bergh, Sverre [1 ]
Benth, Jurate Saltyte [4 ,5 ]
Selbaek, Geir [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Ctr Old Age Psychiat Res, Sanderud, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Ageing & Hlth, Tonsberg, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Akershus Univ Hosp, Res Ctr, HOKH, Lorenskog, Norway
关键词
MAJOR DEPRESSION; TREATMENT-RESPONSE; LATE-ONSET; OLD-AGE; SYMPTOMS; ANTIDEPRESSANT; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTORS; REMISSION; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-015-0577-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Depression and depressive symptoms are highly prevalent in old persons but are potentially reversible. Full recovery is the main goal in the treatment of depressive episodes. Compared to clinical trials, observational studies of patients with depression in late life (DLL) show poorer prognoses in terms of response and remission. However, observational studies on the course of DLL are scarce. The aims of this study were to examine the course of DLL in terms of response, remission and symptom-specific changes as measured by the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and to explore which clinical variables were associated with the response and remission. Methods: This is an observational, multicenter and prospective study of patients aged 60 years and older who were referred to treatment of depression in the department of old-age psychiatry at specialist health care services in Norway. The patients were evaluated with the MADRS at admission to and discharge from hospital. The mean, median, minimum and maximum values for days stayed in hospital were 68, 53, 16 and 301, respectively. Effect size (ES) was calculated to determine which MADRS symptoms changed most during the treatment. To assess the predictors for change in the MADRS score (continuous variable) and for remission and response (both dichotomous variables), regression models adjusting for cluster effects within center were estimated. Results: Of 145 inpatients, 99 (68.3 %) had a response to treatment (50 % or more improvement of the MADRS score). Remission (MADRS score <= 9 at discharge) was experienced in 74 (51.0 %) of the patients. Of the individual MADRS items, "reported sadness" (ES = 0.88) and "lassitude" (ES = 0.80) showed the greatest amount of improvement, and "concentration difficulties" (ES = 0.50) showed the least amount of improvement during treatment. Having a diagnosis of dementia was associated with a lower remission rate and less improvement in the MADRS score during the treatment. Poorer physical health was associated with a lower response rate. Having experienced previous episode(s) of depression was associated with a lower remission rate. Conclusions: Recurrent episodes of depression, poor somatic health and a diagnosis of dementia were found to be negative prognostic factors for the course of DLL. Clinicians should therefore pay close attention to these factors when evaluating treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The course of depression in late life as measured by the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale in an observational study of hospitalized patients
    Tom Borza
    Knut Engedal
    Sverre Bergh
    Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
    Geir Selbæk
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 15
  • [2] Evaluation of clinical course for depression with new evaluation scale and montgomery asberg depression rating scale
    Morishita, Shigeru
    Arita, Seizaburo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (01): : 27 - 30
  • [3] The structure of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale over the course of treatment for depression
    Quilty, Lena C.
    Robinson, Jennifer J.
    Rolland, Jean-Pierre
    De Fruyt, Filip
    Rouillon, Frederic
    Bagby, R. Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (03) : 175 - 184
  • [4] Profile of Depressive symptoms in Late life based on Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale
    Nakulan, Anisha
    Sebind, K.
    Sumesh, T. P.
    Shaji, K. S.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 57 (05) : S57 - S57
  • [5] A comparison of the 'Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression' and the 'Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale'
    Huijbrechts, IPAM
    Haffmans, PMJ
    Jonker, K
    van Dijke, A
    Hoencamp, E
    [J]. ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA, 1999, 11 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [6] Moderate and severe depression gradations for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
    Müller, MJ
    Szegedi, A
    Wetzel, H
    Benkert, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 60 (02) : 137 - 140
  • [7] Defining remission on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
    Zimmerman, M
    Posternak, MA
    Chelminski, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 65 (02) : 163 - 168
  • [8] Validation of Bangla Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRSB)
    Soron, Tanjir Rashid
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 28 : 41 - 46
  • [9] Validation of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in depressed patients in Serbia
    Mihajlovic, Goran
    Vojvodic, Petar
    Vojvodic, Jovana
    Andonov, Ana
    Hinic, Darko
    [J]. SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2021, 149 (5-6) : 316 - 321
  • [10] Comparison of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: Baked Straight From a Randomized Study
    Santi, N. Simple
    Biswal, Sashi B.
    Naik, Birendra Narayan
    Sahoo, Jyoti Prakash
    Rath, Bhabagrahi
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)