Determining Hydraulic Conductivity Using Pumping Data from Low-Flow Sampling

被引:15
|
作者
Robbins, Gary A. [1 ]
Aragon-Jose, Alejandra T. [1 ]
Romero, Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Nat Resources Management & Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
MONITORING WELLS; MULTILEVEL SAMPLERS; SLUG TEST;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00519.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Hydraulic conductivity values computed using the steady-state discharge and drawdown attained while low-flow sampling were evaluated to determine if they were equivalent to those determined from slug testing. Based on testing 12 wells, it was found that the results were statistically equivalent. Conductivity values computed using low-flow sampling parameters were also evaluated as to their reproducibility in actual practice by analyzing consultant data for three wells sampled over three quarterly monitoring periods by four field technicians. The results were found to be reproducible within about a factor of 2 or better. Since the method is based on only one pair of parameters, diligence is required in attaining steady state and in accurately measuring the flow rate and drawdown. Conductivity values computed using this approach can enhance the use of low-flow data gathered in water quality sampling, avoid the need for slug testing in a subsequent phase of investigation, and help reduce the cost of characterizing sites when multilevel samplers are used. Given the practical range of discharge in low-flow sampling, the method was found to be applicable at conductivity values somewhat greater than 10(-6) cm/s. Given the typical accuracy of water level meters and pressure transducers and a maximum discharge of 1 L/min, as mandated by regulatory guidance, the method has a calculated upper conductivity limit in the range of 10(-3) to 10(-2) cm/s.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation Using Low-Flow Purging Data Elaboration in Contaminated Sites
    De Filippi, Francesco Maria
    Iacurto, Silvia
    Ferranti, Flavia
    Sappa, Giuseppe
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [3] Low-Flow Hydraulic Conductivity Tests at Wells that Cross the Water Table
    Aragon-Jose, Alejandra T.
    Robbins, Gary A.
    [J]. GROUND WATER, 2011, 49 (03) : 426 - 431
  • [4] Representative groundwater sampling using low-flow methods
    Bangsund, WJ
    Kangas, KW
    [J]. TAPPI JOURNAL, 1998, 81 (12): : 129 - 136
  • [5] Representative groundwater sampling using low-flow methods
    Bangsund, WJ
    Kangas, KW
    [J]. 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT, BOOKS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 937 - 944
  • [6] Low-flow purging and sampling - Introduction
    不详
    [J]. POLLUTION ENGINEERING, 2003, 35 (05) : 16 - 18
  • [7] DETERMINING UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY FROM TENSIOMETRIC DATA ALONE
    AHUJA, LR
    ROSS, JD
    BRUCE, RR
    CASSEL, DK
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [8] Low-flow purging and sampling ground water
    Ritchey, Joe
    [J]. Standardization News, 2002, 30 (04): : 18 - 23
  • [9] Estimation of hydraulic conductivity by using pumping test data and electrical resistivity data in faults zone
    Lu, Debao
    Huang, Dongjing
    Xu, Cundong
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
  • [10] Using low-flow anesthesia
    Concannon, KT
    [J]. VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1996, 91 (04) : 349 - &