Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Vs Conventional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Functional and Surgical Outcomes of a Prospective Single Surgeon Randomized Study

被引:16
|
作者
Wuernschimmel, Christoph [1 ]
Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista [1 ]
Moschini, Marco [1 ]
Grande, Pietro [1 ]
Baumeister, Philipp [1 ]
Roth, Manuel [2 ]
Mordasini, Livio [1 ]
Mattei, Agostino [1 ]
机构
[1] Luzerner Kantonsspital, Klin Urol, CH-6000 Luzern 16, Switzerland
[2] Luzerner Kantonsspital, Klin Radiol, Luzern, Switzerland
关键词
renal cell carcinoma; small renal mass; laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; nephron sparing surgery; selective ischemia; total ischemia; warm ischemia time; renal scintigraphy; RENAL-FUNCTION; WARM ISCHEMIA; SCINTIGRAPHY; PRESERVATION; MARGIN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1089/end.2020.0143
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) are commonly used techniques for treating small renal masses. Regarding renal function (RF) preservation, no superiority of one technique over the other has yet been definitely demonstrated. Objective:To compare functional and surgical outcomes of LPN and RAPN. Patients and Methods:Between 2015 and 2019, we prospectively randomized 115 patients with cT1-T2 renal masses to LPN in total ischemia or RAPN in selective ischemia. Primary endpoint was RF preservation, assessed by renal scintigraphy (RS). RS assessments were performed preoperatively and at 6 months follow-up. Secondary endpoints included clinical, histopathologic, and surgical outcomes. Results:One hundred eight patients were included in the final analysis. Patient and tumor characteristics were comparable. No significant difference in RS values after 6 months was observed between both groups. Median (interquartile range) RF change after 6 months was -18.0% (-26.5 to -11.0) in LPN group and -20.0 (-33.2 to -12.0) in RAPN group (p = 0.3). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) warm ischemia time was 21.1 (6.1) minutes in LPN group and 19.6 (7.7) minutes in RAPN group (p = 0.2). No positive surgical margins (PSMs) occurred in the LPN group, whereas RAPN group had PSM in 4.9% (n = 3);p = 0.099. Renal volume loss after 6 months was 27.5% (22.7-45.7) in the LPN groupvs37.5 (13.7-54.2) in the RAPN group (p = 0.5). Mean operative times were lower in the LPN group (192.3 minutes [SD 44.5]vs230.2 minutes [SD 59.6],p = 0.001). More complications occurred in the LPN group (31%vs21%,p = 0.075). Transfusion rates were 15% for LPN and 11% for RAPN. Conclusions:In terms of preserving RF, LPN in total ischemia and RAPN in selective ischemia are comparable. In most patients, RF decrease of the affected kidney after PN seems to not exceed 25%, regardless of the surgical approach.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 855
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
    Jeong, Wooju
    Park, Sung Yul
    Lorenzo, Enrique Ian S.
    Oh, Cheol Kyu
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Rha, Koon Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (09) : 1457 - 1460
  • [2] Surgical and functional outcomes of repeat robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy compared with repeat open partial nephrectomy
    Yoshida, Kazuhiko
    Oida, Nao
    Kondo, Tsunenori
    Kobari, Yuki
    Ishihara, Hiroki
    Fukuda, Hironori
    Iizuka, Junpei
    Kobayashi, Hirohito
    Ishida, Hideki
    Takagi, Toshio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 355 - 361
  • [3] Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of Outcomes
    Kural, Ali Riza
    Atug, Fatih
    Tufek, Ilter
    Akpinar, Haluk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (09) : 1491 - 1497
  • [4] Cost comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    O'Malley, R. L.
    Kowalik, T.
    Hayn, M. H.
    Collins, T. B.
    Kim, H. L.
    Schwaab, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07)
  • [5] Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Mottrie, A.
    Koliakos, N.
    De Naeyer, G.
    Willemsen, P.
    Carpentier, P.
    Schatteman, P.
    Fonteyne, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 337 - 337
  • [6] A Comparison of Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Pure Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
    Choi, Jae Duck
    Park, Jong Wook
    Lee, Hye Won
    Lee, Dong-Gi
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Seo, Seong Il
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2013, 17 (02) : 292 - 299
  • [7] Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Functional and oncological outcomes
    Roos, F. C.
    Thomas, C.
    Neisius, A.
    Nestler, S.
    Thueroff, J. W.
    Hampel, C.
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (02): : 213 - 218
  • [8] Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Superiority over laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    Fukami, Naohiko
    Fukaya, Kosuke
    Kusaka, Mamoru
    Natsume, Takahiro
    Ichihara, Takashi
    Toyama, Hiroshi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (02) : 122 - 131
  • [9] Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A single institution experience
    Chaste, D.
    Couapel, J. -P.
    Fardoun, T.
    Vincendeau, S.
    Mathieu, R.
    Rioux-Leciercq, N.
    Verhoest, G.
    Bensalah, K.
    [J]. PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2013, 23 (03): : 176 - 183
  • [10] Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy A retrospective comparative study
    Guo, Ju
    Zhang, Cheng
    Zhou, Xiaochen
    Wang, Gongxian
    Fu, Bin
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (38)