The Skeletal Muscle Anabolic Response to Plant- versus Animal-Based Protein Consumption

被引:380
|
作者
van Vliet, Stephan [1 ,2 ]
Burd, Nicholas A. [1 ,2 ]
van Loon, Luc J. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Kinesiol & Community Hlth, Urbana, IL USA
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Human Movement Sci, Sch Nutr & Translat Res Metab NUTRIM, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION | 2015年 / 145卷 / 09期
关键词
plant protein; animal protein; muscle mass; vegetarian; exercise; aging; DIETARY AMINO-ACIDS; TRAINING-INDUCED CHANGES; RESISTANCE EXERCISE; BODY-COMPOSITION; LEUCINE SUPPLEMENTATION; WHEY-PROTEIN; SOY-PROTEIN; IN-VIVO; DIFFERENTIAL STIMULATION; MASS INDEX;
D O I
10.3945/jn.114.204305
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Clinical and consumer market interest is increasingly directed toward the use of plant-based proteins as dietary components aimed at preserving or increasing skeletal muscle mass. However, recent evidence suggests that the ingestion of the plant-based proteins in soy and wheat results in a lower muscle protein synthetic response when compared with several animal-based proteins. The possible lower anabolic properties of plant-based protein sources may be attributed to the lower digestibility of plant-based sources, in addition to greater splanchnic extraction and subsequent urea synthesis of plant protein-derived amino acids compared with animal-based proteins. The latter may be related to the relative lack of specific essential amino acids in plant-as opposed to animal-based proteins. Furthermore, most plant proteins have a relatively low leucine content, which may further reduce their anabolic properties when compared with animal proteins. However, few studies have actually assessed the postprandial muscle protein synthetic response to the ingestion of plant proteins, with soy and wheat protein being the primary sources studied. Despite the proposed lower anabolic properties of plant vs. animal proteins, various strategies may be applied to augment the anabolic properties of plant proteins. These may include the following: 1) fortification of plant-based protein sources with the amino acids methionine, lysine, and/or leucine; 2) selective breeding of plant sources to improve amino acid profiles; 3) consumption of greater amounts of plant-based protein sources; or 4) ingesting multiple protein sources to provide a more balanced amino acid profile. However, the efficacy of such dietary strategies on postprandial muscle protein synthesis remains to be studied. Future research comparing the anabolic properties of a variety of plant-based proteins should define the preferred protein sources to be used in nutritional interventions to support skeletal muscle mass gain or maintenance in both healthy and clinical populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1981 / 1991
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Role of the Anabolic Properties of Plant- versus Animal-Based Protein Sources in Supporting Muscle Mass Maintenance: A Critical Review
    Berrazaga, Insaf
    Micard, Valerie
    Gueugneau, Marine
    Walrand, Stephane
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [2] Plant- and Animal-Based Protein-Rich Foods and Cardiovascular Health
    Wang, Yu
    Hill, Erica R.
    Campbell, Wayne W.
    O'Connor, Lauren E.
    [J]. CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2022, 24 (04) : 197 - 213
  • [3] Plant- and Animal-Based Protein-Rich Foods and Cardiovascular Health
    Yu Wang
    Erica R. Hill
    Wayne W. Campbell
    Lauren E. O’Connor
    [J]. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2022, 24 : 197 - 213
  • [4] An Analysis of the Plant- and Animal-Based Hydrocolloids as Byproducts of the Food Industry
    Waraczewski, Robert
    Muszynski, Siemowit
    Solowiej, Bartosz G.
    [J]. MOLECULES, 2022, 27 (24):
  • [5] Effect of Plant- and Animal-Based Foods on Prostate Cancer Risk
    Shin, John
    Millstine, Denise
    Ruddy, Barbara
    Wallace, Mark
    Fields, Heather
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2019, 119 (11): : 736 - 746
  • [6] Integrating plant- and animal-based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity
    McAlpine, Clive
    Catterall, Carla P.
    Mac Nally, Ralph
    Lindenmayer, David
    Reid, J. Leighton
    Holl, Karen D.
    Bennett, Andrew F.
    Runting, Rebecca K.
    Wilson, Kerrie
    Hobbs, Richard J.
    Seabrook, Leonie
    Cunningham, Shaun
    Moilanen, Atte
    Maron, Martine
    Shoo, Luke
    Lunt, Ian
    Vesk, Peter
    Rumpff, Libby
    Martin, Tara G.
    Thomson, James
    Possingham, Hugh
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [7] Plant- and Animal-Based Antioxidants' Structure, Efficacy, Mechanisms, and Applications: A Review
    Abeyrathne, Edirisinghe Dewage Nalaka Sandun
    Nam, Kichang
    Huang, Xi
    Ahn, Dong Uk
    [J]. ANTIOXIDANTS, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [8] A comparative study on carbon footprints between plant- and animal-based foods in China
    Xu, Xiaoming
    Lan, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 2581 - 2592
  • [9] Effects of Motivation Framing and Content Domain on Intentions to Eat Plant- and Animal-Based Foods
    Duchene, T. N.
    Jackson, L. M.
    [J]. SOCIETY & ANIMALS, 2019, 27 (5-6) : 526 - 543
  • [10] Plant- and animal-based diet quality and mortality among US adults: a cohort study
    Keaver, Laura
    Ruan, Mengyuan
    Chen, Fan
    Du, Mengxi
    Ding, Chenyueyi
    Wang, Jiaqi
    Shan, Zhilei
    Liu, Junxiu
    Zhang, Fang Fang
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2021, 125 (12) : 1405 - 1415