Exploring inherent process safety indicators and approaches for their estimation: A systematic review

被引:44
|
作者
Jafari, Mohammad Javad [1 ]
Mohammadi, Heidar [1 ]
Reniers, Genserik [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pouyakian, Mostafa [1 ]
Nourai, Farshad [5 ]
Torabi, Seyed Ali [6 ]
Miandashti, Masoud Rafiee [7 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat Hlth Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Safety & Secur Sci Grp S3G, Fac Technol Policy & Management, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
[3] Univ Antwerp, FTEW, Dept Engn Management, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[4] KULeuven, CEDON, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[5] ProNEXO Engn Consultancy, Tehran, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
[7] Natl Petrochem Co, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Inherent safety; Measurement; Index-based; Indicators; Process; CHEMICAL-PROCESS ROUTES; PRELIMINARY DESIGN; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; RISK-ASSESSMENT; EXPERT-SYSTEM; ANALYSIS TOOL; PROCESS PLANT; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2018.01.013
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The index-based approach is one of the most popular ways to measure the inherent safety degree of a chemical route or process during the early design stages. One of the main shortcomings of current indices is the limited set of aspects which are considered and are influencing inherent safety. In addition, the minimal knowledge of process designers regarding inherent safety hazards can exacerbate this problem. In this study, we identify the inherent safety indicators (within the period 1990-2017) used to measure the inherent safety degree of a process, and describe existing approaches to estimate these indicators. Bibliographic sites, including the Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer, ACS publications and Online Library, were searched based on various search strategies. A total of 62 resources were selected, and 35 indicators were found that were classified into six categories: (i) the 'chemical and physical properties of a chemical substance (11 indicators); (ii) the 'process conditions' (5 indicators); (iii) the 'equipment (5 indicators); (iv) the 'reaction/decomposition properties' (3 indicators); (v) the 'activities and operations characteristics' (4 indicators); and (vi) the 'consequences' (7 indicators). We also found six estimation approaches, including the relative rating, an advanced mathematical approach (statistical, numerical descriptive and fuzziness), the risk-based, graphical, equational (or formula) based approach and the hybrid approach. This study can provide a quick guide for non-experienced researchers being enthusiast to work on inherent safety measurements using an index-based approach.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 80
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic review on the implementation methodologies of inherent safety in chemical process
    Gao, Xiaoming
    Raman, Abdul Aziz Abdul
    Hizaddin, Hanee F.
    Bello, Mustapha Mohammed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2020, 65
  • [2] A review of different approaches for developing process safety indicators
    Monteiro, G. P.
    Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 3000 - 3008
  • [3] Perioperative structure and process quality and safety indicators: a systematic review
    Chazapis, M.
    Gilhooly, D.
    Smith, A. F.
    Myles, P. S.
    Haller, G.
    Grocott, M. P. W.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (01) : 51 - 66
  • [4] Process Safety Indicators, a literature review
    Swuste, Paul
    Theunissen, Jos
    Reniers, Genserik
    [J]. SHO2015: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE, 2015, : 388 - 390
  • [5] Process safety indicators, a review of literature
    Swuste, Paul
    Theunissen, Jos
    Schmitz, Peter
    Reniers, Genserik
    Blokland, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 40 : 162 - 173
  • [6] Systematic inherent safety and its implementation in chlorine liquefaction process
    Gao, Xiaoming
    Raman, Abdul Aziz Abdul
    Hizaddin, Hanee F.
    Buthiyappan, Archina
    Bello, Mustapha M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2020, 65
  • [7] Quality and Safety Indicators in Anesthesia A Systematic Review
    Haller, Guy
    Stoelwinder, Johannes
    Myles, Paul S.
    McNeil, John
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 110 (05) : 1158 - 1175
  • [8] Safety leading indicators in construction: A systematic review
    Xu, Jing
    Cheung, Clara
    Manu, Patrick
    Ejohwomu, Obuks
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2021, 139
  • [9] Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review
    Ranasinghe, Udara
    Jefferies, Marcus
    Davis, Peter
    Pillay, Manikam
    [J]. SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2020, 11 (02) : 127 - 135
  • [10] A comprehensive systematic review of safety leading indicators in construction
    Golabchi, Hamidreza
    Abellanosa, Abbey Dale
    Lefsrud, Lianne
    Pereira, Estacio
    Mohamed, Yasser
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2024, 172