Analyzing temporally correlated dolphin sightings data using generalized estimating equations

被引:32
|
作者
Bailey, Helen [1 ]
Corkrey, Ross [1 ]
Cheney, Barbara [1 ]
Thompson, Paul M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Lighthouse Field Stn, Inst Biol & Environm Sci, Cromarty IV11 8YJ, Ross Shire, Scotland
关键词
bottlenose dolphin; correlations; GEE; interannual variation; temporal variation; tidal cycle; Tursiops truncatus; BOTTLE-NOSED DOLPHINS; SCALE HABITAT SELECTION; TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS; FORAGING HABITAT; LINEAR-MODELS; REGRESSION-ANALYSIS; MOVEMENT PATTERNS; NEW-ZEALAND; PREDATION; DIEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00552.x
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Many of the statistical techniques commonly used in ecology assume independence among responses. However, there are many marine mammal survey techniques, such as those involving time series or subgroups, which result in correlations within the data. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) take such correlations into account and are an extension of generalized linear models. This study demonstrates the application of GEEs by modeling temporal variation in bottlenose dolphin presence from sightings data. Since dolphins could remain in the study area for several hours resulting in temporal autocorrelation, an autoregressive correlation structure was used within the GEE, each cluster representing hours within a day of survey effort. The results of the GEE model showed that there was significant diel, tidal, and interannual variation in the presence of dolphins. Dolphins were most likely to be seen in the early morning and during the summer months. Dolphin presence generally peaked during low tide, but this varied among years. There was a significantly lower probability of dolphins being present in 2003 than 2004, but not between 2004 and the other years (1991, 1992, and 2002). GEE-model fitting packages are now readily available, making this a valuable, versatile tool for marine mammal biologists.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 141
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation
    Hanley, JA
    Negassa, A
    Edwardes, MDD
    Forrester, JE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (04) : 364 - 375
  • [2] Generalized estimating equations for analyzing multivariate survival data
    Liya, Fu
    Yang, Zhuoran
    Zhang, Jun
    Long, Anle
    Zhou, Yan
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2021, 50 (10) : 3060 - 3068
  • [3] Analyzing Cross-Sectionally Clustered Data Using Generalized Estimating Equations
    Huang, Francis L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2022, 47 (01) : 101 - 125
  • [4] Re: "Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation"
    Zou, GY
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 158 (03) : 289 - 289
  • [5] Generalized Estimating Equations Boosting (GEEB) machine for correlated data
    Yuan-Wey Wang
    Hsin-Chou Yang
    Yi-Hau Chen
    Chao-Yu Guo
    [J]. Journal of Big Data, 11
  • [6] Generalized Estimating Equations Boosting (GEEB) machine for correlated data
    Wang, Yuan-Wey
    Yang, Hsin-Chou
    Chen, Yi-Hau
    Guo, Chao-Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [7] GENERALIZED ESTIMATING EQUATIONS FOR CORRELATED BINARY DATA - USING THE ODDS RATIO AS A MEASURE OF ASSOCIATION
    LIPSITZ, SR
    LAIRD, NM
    HARRINGTON, DP
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1991, 78 (01) : 153 - 160
  • [8] Analyzing multivariate longitudinal binary data: a generalized estimating equations approach
    Sutradhar, BC
    Farrell, PJ
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2004, 32 (01): : 39 - 55
  • [9] Second-order generalized estimating equations for correlated count data
    George Kalema
    Geert Molenberghs
    Wondwosen Kassahun
    [J]. Computational Statistics, 2016, 31 : 749 - 770
  • [10] Second-order generalized estimating equations for correlated count data
    Kalema, George
    Molenberghs, Geert
    Kassahun, Wondwosen
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2016, 31 (02) : 749 - 770