Development of the Qualeffo-31, an osteoporosis-specific quality-of-life questionnaire

被引:23
|
作者
Schoor, NM
Knol, DL
Glas, CAW
Ostelo, RWJG
Leplège, A
Cooper, C
Johnell, O
Lips, P
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Endocrinol, NL-1007 Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1007 Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1007 Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Twente, Dept Educ Measurement & Data Anal, Enschede, Netherlands
[5] Hop Bicetre, U292, INSERM, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[6] Univ Southampton, MRC Epidemiol Resource Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
[7] Malmo Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Malmo, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
item response theory; quality of life; Qualeffo-31; Qualeffo-41; vertebral fracture;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-005-0024-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Vertebral deformities are a common consequence of osteoporosis and are known to decrease quality of life. The Qualeffo-41 is a quality-of-life questionnaire especially developed for measuring quality of life in patients with vertebral deformities. It consists of 41 questions arranged in five domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. The objectives of this study were: (1) to develop a shorter version of the Qualeffo-41 by removing redundant questions; and (2) to investigate the scale characteristics, reliability, and validity of this shorter version. The study was performed using data from the Qualeffo validation study and the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) study. The analyses were performed in patients with vertebral deformities (n=579). Factor analysis on polychoric correlations and an item response theory (IRT) model, i.e., the generalized partial credit model (GPCM), were used to create a shorter version of Qualeffo-41. Using GPCM, scoring weights were computed for all items. Three items were removed from the data set because of too many missing values. Factor analysis identified three instead of five domains: (1) pain, (2) physical function, and (3) mental function. Five items had factor loadings < 0.4 and were not included in the GPCM. After excluding several items, the domains pain (four items), physical function (18 items), and mental function (nine items) showed a good, reasonable, and excellent fit, respectively. This indicates that the mental function domain and the pain domain are more unidimensional than the physical function domain. All three domains showed a very high correlation (r >= 0.95) with the corresponding domains of the Qualeffo-41. Qualeffo-31 was developed, consisting of three domains with a reasonable to excellent fit to the GPCM. Although the fit to the GPCM supports the construct validity of the Qualeffo-31, validation in a new study should be performed before using it in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 551
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of the Qualeffo–31, an osteoporosis-specific quality-of-life questionnaire
    N. M. van Schoor
    D. L. Knol
    C. A. W. Glas
    R. W. J. G. Ostelo
    A. Leplège
    C. Cooper
    O. Johnell
    P. Lips
    [J]. Osteoporosis International, 2006, 17 : 543 - 551
  • [2] Validation of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-31) in Chinese
    Lai, Billy M. H.
    Tsang, Shirley W. Y.
    Lam, Cindy L. K.
    Kung, Annie W. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 29 (09) : 965 - 972
  • [3] Validation of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-31) in Chinese
    Billy M. H. Lai
    Shirley W. Y. Tsang
    Cindy L. K. Lam
    Annie W. C. Kung
    [J]. Clinical Rheumatology, 2010, 29 : 965 - 972
  • [4] Taiwanese Chinese translation and validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis 31 (QUALEFFO-31)
    Li, Wei-Chun
    Chen, Yi-Chan
    Yang, Rong-Sen
    Kuo, Ken N.
    Chen, Ching-Yu
    Tsauo, Jau-Yih
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 112 (10) : 621 - 629
  • [5] Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-31)
    Chuanwen Zhou
    Qianjun Li
    Shushu Huang
    Lu Fan
    Bingjian Wang
    Jian Dai
    Xiaoming Tang
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 318 - 324
  • [6] Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-31)
    Zhou, Chuanwen
    Li, Qianjun
    Huang, Shushu
    Fan, Lu
    Wang, Bingjian
    Dai, Jian
    Tang, Xiaoming
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (01) : 318 - 324
  • [7] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis-31 (QUALEFFO-31)
    Bugra Ince
    Okan Kucukakkas
    [J]. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2021, 16
  • [8] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis-31 (QUALEFFO-31)
    Ince, Bugra
    Kucukakkas, Okan
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [9] Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: The development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO)
    Caulin, F
    Lips, P
    Cooper, C
    Agnusdei, D
    Egger, P
    Johnell, O
    Kanis, JA
    Liberman, U
    Minne, H
    Reeve, J
    Reginster, JY
    deVernejoul, MC
    Wiklund, I
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (7-8) : 58 - 58
  • [10] Validation of the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-26) in Korean population
    Lee, Jung Sub
    Shin, Jong Ki
    Son, Seung Min
    An, Sung Jin
    Kang, Sung Shik
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (07) : 919 - 927