Social life cycle assessment in Indian steel sector: a case study

被引:23
|
作者
Singh, Rajesh Kumar [1 ]
Gupta, Uday [2 ]
机构
[1] Thinkstep Sustainabil Solut Pvt Ltd, 421 MIDAS, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
[2] Mahindra Sanyo Special Steel Pvt Ltd, Khopoli, India
来源
关键词
India; Social life cycle assessment(S-LCA); Materiality assessment; Social hotspots; Stakeholder engagement; Steel industry; METHODOLOGY; CHALLENGES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-017-1427-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) studies have been undertaken to evaluate the social impacts of various products across different geographies, but there is a need for a study which can help in evaluating impacts for peculiar social conditions of country like India. This paper presents a pilot-level case study for identifying hotspots against social impact for an Indian steel company using a S-LCA approach. An aggregation approach has been developed at pilot scale for identification of social hotspots in value chain which is aligned with social context and regional perspective. Categories, subcategories and metrics were determined in the form of social impact indicators using United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) methodological sheets while incorporating feedback from stakeholders and management group. Impact indicators were selected against these subcategories on the basis of their importance to steel industry as well as geographical context. Stakeholder surveys were conducted for key suppliers, employees, customers and community members. Databases of social indicators published by the government were also used for capturing information. Management perspective was captured by interviewing identified senior management. Aggregation and analysis of inventory data was performed and supply chain evaluated. Social impact assessment of life cycle stages was carried out, and aggregated scores were evaluated on the scale of 0 to 1 for each life cycle stage. Total aggregated score was 3.13 against the maximum value of 5 across the entire value chain. For life cycle stages of raw material, transportation, manufacturing, customer and end-of-life scores were found to be above cut-off, indicating an average response of neutral or positive impact as perceived by respondents. Evaluation of the perspectives of stakeholders against management revealed that economic prosperity, training and skill development, healthcare facilities, access to clean water, infrastructure, access to education and workplace safety for workers are key hotspots which are requiring attention and needing improvement. Attempt has been made to develop an aggregation approach for S-LCA in Indian context. Steel sector-specific indicators and perspective of diverse stakeholders across the supply chain were captured. Outcomes of this study reflect the quantitative results of pressing social issues aimed for identification and implementation of social projects targeted at the needs of stakeholders. Some limitations include use of equal weights for indicators, lack of site-specific data, lack of awareness of few stakeholders, hybrid aggregation approach and lacking sensitivity analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 939
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social life cycle assessment in Indian steel sector: a case study
    Rajesh Kumar Singh
    Uday Gupta
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 921 - 939
  • [2] Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Textile Sector: An Italian Case Study
    Lenzo, Paola
    Traverso, Marzia
    Salomone, Roberta
    Ioppolo, Giuseppe
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (11)
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of steel production in Poland: a case study
    Burchart-Korol, Dorota
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 54 : 235 - 243
  • [4] Social Organisational Life Cycle Assessment and Social Life Cycle Assessment: different twins? Correlations from a case study
    Manuela D’Eusanio
    Bianca Maria Tragnone
    Luigia Petti
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 173 - 187
  • [5] Social Organisational Life Cycle Assessment and Social Life Cycle Assessment: different twins? Correlations from a case study
    D'Eusanio, Manuela
    Tragnone, Bianca Maria
    Petti, Luigia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (01): : 173 - 187
  • [6] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF STEEL BALLS CASE STUDY - CRASTER INTERNATIONAL
    Gudukeya, Loice
    Mbohwa, Charles
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (IEOM), 2015,
  • [7] Social Life Cycle Assessment of three companies of the furniture sector
    Shuch Bork, Carlos Alberto
    De Barba Junior, Durval Joao
    Gomes, Jefferson de Oliveira
    [J]. 22ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 : 150 - 155
  • [8] Logics and logistics of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for minimizing green house gas emissions - An Indian case study of automobile sector
    Anand, S
    Kumar, S
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1717 - 1720
  • [9] Using Social Life Cycle Assessment to analyze the contribution of products to the Sustainable Development Goals: a case study in the textile sector
    Ana María Herrera Almanza
    Blanca Corona
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1833 - 1845
  • [10] Using Social Life Cycle Assessment to analyze the contribution of products to the Sustainable Development Goals: a case study in the textile sector
    Herrera Almanza, Ana Maria
    Corona, Blanca
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (09): : 1833 - 1845