Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions

被引:61
|
作者
Xing, Dong [1 ]
Lv, Yongbin [1 ]
Sun, Bolin [2 ]
Xie, Haizhu [1 ]
Dong, Jianjun [1 ]
Hao, Cuijuan [1 ]
Chen, Qianqian [3 ]
Chi, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Dept Radiol, Yantai, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ, Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Intervent Therapy Ward, Yantai, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Yantai, Peoples R China
关键词
breast cancer; contrast agent; contrast-enhanced spectral mammography; magnetic resonance imaging; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0000000000000832
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value between contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast disease. Methods Two hundred thirty-five patients who were suspected of having breast abnormalities by clinical examination or mammography underwent CESM and MRI examination. Using histopathologic results as the criterion standard, the diagnostic performance of CESM and MRI was investigated. The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were applied to analyze diagnostic efficiency. The Pearson correlation coefficients between CESM versus pathology and MRI versus pathology were calculated. Results Two hundred sixty-three breast lesions were found in 235 patients, in which 177 were malignant and 86 were benign. By evaluating the diagnostic value, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and false-negative rate from CESM examination were comparable to those from MRI (91.5%, 94.7%, 83.7%, and 8.5% vs 91.5%, 90.5%, 82.1%, and 8.5%). Importantly, the accuracy and the specificity were higher for CESM than those for MRI (81% and 89.5% vs 80.2% and 71.7%), whereas the false-positive rate was lower (10.5% vs 19.8%). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of CESM and MRI were 0.950 and 0.939, displaying the equivalent diagnostic efficiency (P = 0.48). For the agreement between measurements, mean tumor sizes were 3.1 cm for CESM and 3.4 cm for MRI compared with 3.2 cm on histopathologic results. The Pearson correlation coefficient of CESM versus histopathology (r = 0.774, P = 0.000) was consistent with MRI versus histopathology (r = 0.771, P = 0.000). Conclusions Our results show better accuracy, specificity, and false-positive rate of CESM in breast cancer detection than MRI. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography displayed a good correlation with histopathology in assessing the lesion size of breast cancer, which is consistent with MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 251
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions
    Li, L.
    Roth, R.
    Germaine, P.
    Ren, S.
    Lee, M.
    Hunter, K.
    Tinney, E.
    Liao, L.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (02) : 113 - 123
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging
    Valentina Iotti
    Sara Ravaioli
    Rita Vacondio
    Chiara Coriani
    Sabrina Caffarri
    Roberto Sghedoni
    Andrea Nitrosi
    Moira Ragazzi
    Elisa Gasparini
    Cristina Masini
    Giancarlo Bisagni
    Giuseppe Falco
    Guglielmo Ferrari
    Luca Braglia
    Alberto Del Prato
    Ivana Malavolti
    Vladimiro Ginocchi
    Pierpaolo Pattacini
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 19
  • [3] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging
    Iotti, Valentina
    Ravaioli, Sara
    Vacondio, Rita
    Coriani, Chiara
    Caffarri, Sabrina
    Sghedoni, Roberto
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Ragazzi, Moira
    Gasparini, Elisa
    Masini, Cristina
    Bisagni, Giancarlo
    Falco, Giuseppe
    Ferrari, Guglielmo
    Braglia, Luca
    Del Prato, Alberto
    Malavolti, Ivana
    Ginocchi, Vladimiro
    Pattacini, Pierpaolo
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
  • [4] Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
    Kim, Eun Young
    Youn, Inyoung
    Lee, Kwan Ho
    Yun, Ji-Sup
    Park, Yong Lai
    Park, Chan Heun
    Moon, Juhee
    Choi, Seon Hyeong
    Choi, Yoon Jung
    Ham, Soo-Youn
    Kook, Shin Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (04) : 453 - 462
  • [5] Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Acar, Cagdas Riza
    Orguc, Sebnem
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2024, 24 (06) : 481 - 493
  • [6] Contrast-enhanced mammography as an alternative to breast magnetic resonance imaging
    Movassaghi, Roshanack
    Neveu, Marine
    Mascarel, Anne-Margaux
    Vilcot, Laurence
    Geffroy, Delphine
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    [J]. IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 145 - 150
  • [7] BIRADS 4 breast lesions: comparison of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI
    Yasin R.
    El Ghany E.A.
    [J]. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 50 (1):
  • [8] Application of the Kaiser score on contrast-enhanced mammography in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions: comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging
    Rong, Xiaocui
    Kang, Yihe
    Li, Yanan
    Xue, Jing
    Li, Zhigang
    Yang, Guang
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (08) : 5541 - 5554
  • [9] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Breast Imaging
    Lancaster, Rachael B.
    Gulla, Shannon
    De Los Santos, Jennifer
    Umphrey, Heidi R.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of subjective kinetic assessment of masses in contrast-enhanced mammography in comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Prema Subramaniam
    Rupa Renganathan
    P. Suganya
    Adrija Mandal
    [J]. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 54