Validation of the Ambivalent and Purposeful Engagement - Trait Measure

被引:3
|
作者
Fernandez, Katya C. [1 ]
Langer, Julia K. [1 ]
Rodebaugh, Thomas L. [1 ]
Jakatdar, Tejal A. [2 ]
Heimberg, Richard G. [2 ]
Lenze, Eric J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING | 2014年 / 27卷 / 03期
关键词
ambivalent and purposeful engagement - trait measure; social anxiety; ambivalent engagement; purposeful engagement; resilient coping; BORDERLINE-PERSONALITY-DISORDER; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; FEAR; IV;
D O I
10.1080/10615806.2013.838228
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The Ambivalent and Purposeful Engagement-Trait Measure (APE-TM) was developed to assess two ways that people may react to stressful social interactions: ambivalent engagement (AE: counterproductive attempts to avoid thoughts and feelings) and purposeful engagement (PE: effortfully approaching and working through thoughts and feelings). We carried out three studies in undergraduate and clinical populations to (i) test the robustness of previous psychometric findings and (ii) determine whether AE and PE are specific to social anxiety. Across three studies, our results indicate that the APE-TM is a psychometrically valid measure of ambivalent and purposeful engagement. However, PE appeared less specific to social anxiety and may represent a more general tendency toward adaptive coping. In contrast, AE was specific to social anxiety in both undergraduate samples and clinical samples of individuals with a variety of anxiety disorders and depression.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 334
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement of ambivalent and purposeful engagement after aversive social experiences
    Rodebaugh, Thomas L.
    Heimberg, Richard G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2008, 22 (04) : 693 - 706
  • [2] Purposeful Engagement
    Iacono, Maureen V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2020, 35 (02) : 217 - 218
  • [3] Work Engagement: The Creation and Validation of a New Measure
    Kuok, Angus C. H.
    Taormina, Robert J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL SCIENCE, HUMANITIES, AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 43 : 139 - 142
  • [4] Content validation of a quantitative stakeholder engagement measure
    Goodman, Melody S.
    Ackermann, Nicole
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Thompson, Vetta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 47 (08) : 1937 - 1951
  • [5] Purposeful Global Engagement in Pharmacy Education
    Alsharif, Naser Z.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 81 (10) : 3 - 5
  • [6] Purposeful Engagement, Healthy Aging, and the Brain
    Ryff C.D.
    Heller A.S.
    Schaefer S.M.
    van Reekum C.
    Davidson R.J.
    [J]. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2016, 3 (4) : 318 - 327
  • [7] TEACHERS' ENGAGEMENT IN WORKPLACE LEARNING ACTIVITIES: VALIDATION OF A MEASURE
    Ariffin, Tengku Faekah Tengku
    Hashim, Rosna Awang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2010, 17 (02): : 105 - 120
  • [8] Validation of the Spanish Version of the School Engagement Measure (SEM)
    Ramos-Diaz, Estibaliz
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, Arantzazu
    Revuelta, Lorena
    [J]. SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 19
  • [9] The Development and Validation of an Ideal Point Measure of Work Engagement
    Michael M. DeNunzio
    Rachel Williamson Smith
    Loren J. Naidoo
    [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2024, 39 : 345 - 368
  • [10] The Development and Validation of an Ideal Point Measure of Work Engagement
    DeNunzio, Michael M. M.
    Smith, Rachel Williamson
    Naidoo, Loren J. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 39 (02) : 345 - 368