A systematic review of the relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based clinical settings. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 24

被引:30
|
作者
de Jong, Jip [1 ]
Visser, Mechteld [1 ]
Van Dijk, Nynke [1 ]
van der Vleuten, Cees [2 ]
Wieringa-de Waard, Margreet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice Family Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Fac Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
FAMILY MEDICINE CLERKSHIP; AMBULATORY CARE; SELF-ASSESSMENT; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; STUDENTS EXPERIENCE; DELIBERATE PRACTICE; PERFORMANCE; EDUCATION; COMPETENCE; SUPERVISION;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2013.797570
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Clinical workplace-based learning has been the means to becoming a medical professional for many years. The importance of an adequate patient mix, as defined by the number of patients and the types of medical problems, for an optimal learning process is based on educational theory and recognised by national and international accreditation standards. The relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based curricula as yet remains unclear. Aim: To review research addressing the relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based clinical settings. Method: The search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Web of Science, ERIC and the Cochrane Library from the start date of the database to July 2011. Original quantitative studies on the relationship between patient mix and learning for learners at any level of the formal medical training/career were included. Methodological quality was assessed and two reviewers using pre-specified forms extracted results. Results: A total of 10,420 studies were screened on title and abstract. Of these, 298 articles were included for full-text analysis, which resulted in the inclusion of 22 papers. The quality of the included studies, scored with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), ranged from 8.0 to 14.5 (of 18 points). A positive relationship was found between patient mix and self-reported outcomes evaluating the progress in competence as experienced by the trainee, such as self-confidence and comfort level. Patient mix was also found to correlate positively with self-reported outcomes evaluating the quality of the learning period, such as self-reported learning benefit, experienced effectiveness of the rotation, or the instructional quality. Variables, such as supervision and learning style, might mediate this relationship. A relationship between patient mix and formal assessment has never been demonstrated. Conclusion: Patient mix is positively related to self-reported learning outcome, most evidently the experienced quality of the learning programme.
引用
收藏
页码:E1181 / E1196
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39
    Reeves, Scott
    Fletcher, Simon
    Barr, Hugh
    Birch, Ivan
    Boet, Sylvain
    Davies, Nigel
    McFadyen, Angus
    Rivera, Josette
    Kitto, Simon
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (07) : 656 - 668
  • [2] The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23
    Thistlethwaite, Jill Elizabeth
    Davies, David
    Ekeocha, Samilia
    Kidd, Jane M.
    MacDougall, Colin
    Matthews, Paul
    Purkis, Judith
    Clay, Diane
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (06) : E421 - E444
  • [3] Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44
    Losco, C. Dominique
    Grant, William D.
    Armson, Anthony
    Meyer, Amanda J.
    Walker, Bruce F.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2017, 39 (03) : 234 - 243
  • [4] Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80
    Daniel, Michelle
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Wooten, Darcy
    Stojan, Jennifer
    Haas, Mary R. C.
    Bailey, Jacob
    Evans, Sean
    Lee, Daniel
    Goldberg, Charles
    Fernandez, Jorge
    Jassal, Simerjot K.
    Rudolf, Frances
    Guluma, Kama
    Lander, Lina
    Pott, Emily
    Goldhaber, Nicole H.
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    Uraiby, Hussain
    Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
    Gordon, Morris
    Pawlikowska, Teresa
    Corral, Janet
    Partha, Indu
    Kolman, Karyn B.
    Westrick, Jennifer
    Dolmans, Diana
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (12) : 1313 - 1331
  • [5] A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32
    Park, Sophie
    Khan, Nada F.
    Hampshire, Mandy
    Knox, Richard
    Malpass, Alice
    Thomas, James
    Anagnostelis, Betsy
    Newman, Mark
    Bower, Peter
    Rosenthal, Joe
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Iliffe, Steve
    Heneghan, Carl
    Band, Amanda
    Georgieva, Zoya
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2015, 37 (07) : 611 - 630
  • [6] The failure to fail underperforming trainees in health professions education: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 42
    Yepes-Rios, Monica
    Dudek, Nancy
    Duboyce, Rita
    Curtis, Jerri
    Allard, Rhonda J.
    Varpio, Lara
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (11) : 1092 - 1099
  • [7] Interventions for undergraduate and postgraduate medical learners with academic difficulties: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 56
    Lacasse, Miriam
    Audetat, Marie-Claude
    Boileau, Elisabeth
    Fon, Nathalie Caire
    Dufour, Marie-Helene
    Laferriere, Marie-Claude
    Lafleur, Alexandre
    La Rue, Eve
    Lee, Shirley
    Nendaz, Mathieu
    Raynard, Emmanuelle Paquette
    Simard, Caroline
    Steinert, Yvonne
    Theoret, Johanne
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (09) : 981 - 1001
  • [8] Impact of an intercalated BSc on medical student performance and careers: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 28
    Jones, Melvyn
    Hutt, Patrick
    Eastwood, Sophie
    Singh, Surinder
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (10) : E1493 - E1510
  • [9] Patient/service user involvement in medical education: A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 58
    Gordon, Morris
    Gupta, Simon
    Thornton, Debra
    Reid, Michael
    Mallen, Ernie
    Melling, Angela
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (01) : 4 - 16
  • [10] The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 21
    Nelson, Cody
    Hartling, Lisa
    Campbell, Sandra
    Oswald, Anna E.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (06) : E386 - E405