Fracture Strength and Failure Mode of Maxillary Implant-Supported Provisional Single Crowns: A Comparison of Composite Resin Crowns Fabricated Directly Over PEEK Abutments and Solid Titanium Abutments

被引:77
|
作者
Santing, Hendrik Jacob [1 ]
Meijer, Henny J. A. [1 ,2 ]
Raghoebar, Gerry M. [1 ]
Oezcan, Mutlu [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Fixed & Removable Prosthodont, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Zurich, Dent Mat Unit, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
composite resin; dental; failure type; fracture strength; implant-supported; provisional; ALL-CERAMIC RESTORATIONS; AESTHETIC ZONE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BITE FORCE; IMMEDIATE; RESISTANCE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00322.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) temporary abutments have been recently introduced for making implant-supported provisional single crowns. Little information is available in the dental literature on the durability of provisional implant-supported restorations. Purpose: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the fracture strength of implant-supported composite resin crowns on PEEK and solid titanium temporary abutments, and to analyze the failure types. Material and Methods: Three types of provisional abutments, RN synOcta Temporary Meso Abutment (PEEK; Straumann), RN synOcta Titanium Post for Temporary Restorations (Straumann), and Temporary Abutment Engaging NobRplRP (Nobel Biocare) were used, and provisional screw-retained crowns using composite resin (Solidex) were fabricated for four different locations in the maxilla. The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute until fracture occurred. The failure types were analyzed and further categorized as irreparable (Type 1) or reparable (Type 2). Results: No significant difference was found between different abutment types. Only for the position of the maxillary central incisor, composite resin crowns on PEEK temporary abutments showed significantly lower (p < 0.05) fracture strength (95 +/- 21 N) than those on titanium temporary abutments (1,009 +/- 94 N). The most frequently experienced failure types were cohesive fractures of the composite resin crowns (75 out of 104), followed by screw loosening (18 out of 104). According to reparability, the majority of the specimens were classified as Type 1 (82 out of 104). Type 2 failures were not often observed (22 out of 104). Conclusions: Provisional crowns on PEEK abutments showed similar fracture strength as titanium temporary abutments except for central incisors. Maxillary right central incisor composite resin crowns on PEEK temporary abutments fractured below the mean anterior masticatory loading forces reported to be approximately 206 N.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 889
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Stiffness, Strength, and Failure Modes of Implant-Supported Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Influence of Titanium and Zirconia Abutments
    Joda, Tim
    Buerki, Alexander
    Bethge, Stefan
    Braegger, Urs
    Zysset, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (06) : 1272 - 1279
  • [2] Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations
    Sghaireen, Mohd G.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (03) : 554 - 561
  • [3] Fracture strength of different veneers on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks in implant-supported single crowns
    Tekin, Samet
    Demirci, Fatih
    Bakir, Metin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 35 (04): : 167 - 171
  • [4] A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns
    Cho, HW
    Dong, JK
    Jin, TH
    Oh, SC
    Lee, HH
    Lee, JW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2002, 15 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [5] Fracture Strength of Implant-Supported Ceramic Crowns with Customized Zirconia Abutments: Screw Retained vs. Cement Retained
    Lima Verde Nogueira, Lorenna Bastos
    Vilarinho Soares Moura, Carmem Dolores
    Francischone, Carlos Eduardo
    Valente, Valdimar Silva
    Mendes Alencar, Suya Moura
    Moura, Walter Leal
    Soares Martins, Gregorio Antonio
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (01): : 49 - 53
  • [6] Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue
    Spitznagel, F. A.
    Bonfante, E. A.
    Vollmer, F.
    Gierthmuehlen, P. C.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 31 (02): : 136 - 146
  • [7] Implant-Supported Single Crowns with Titanium or Zirconia Abutments: A Retrospective Up-to-5-year Follow-up Study
    Olander, Julia
    Wennerberg, Ann
    Stenport, Victoria Franke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (04) : 387 - 395
  • [8] Clinical, Technical, and Radiologic Outcomes of 182 Implant-Supported Zirconia Single Crowns Using Titanium-Base Abutments: A Retrospective Study
    Guncu, Mustafa Baris
    Aktas, Guliz
    Guncu, Guliz N.
    Anil, Duygu
    Turkyilmaz, Ilser
    Antonoff, Lisa R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (04) : 553 - 559
  • [9] Temporary Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using Titanium Base Abutments: An In Vitro Study on Bonding Stability and Pull-out Forces
    Pitta, Joao
    Bijelic-Donova, Jasmina
    Burkhardt, Felix
    Fehmer, Vincent
    Narhi, Timo
    Sailer, Irena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (05) : 546 - 552
  • [10] Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments
    Elsayed, Adham
    Yazigi, Christine
    Kern, Matthias
    Chaar, Mohamed Sad
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2021, 37 (08) : E435 - E442