Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study

被引:9
|
作者
Molina-Perez, Alberto [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rodriguez-Arias, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Delgado, Janet [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Ins Estudios Soc Avanzados ISA, Cordoba, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Philosophy, FiloLab UGR Sci Unit Excellence, Granada, Spain
[3] European Soc Organ Transplantat, Eth Legal & Psychosocial Aspects Transplantat ELP, Padua, Italy
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 09期
关键词
PRESUMED CONSENT SYSTEMS; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057107
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To increase postmortem organ donation rates, several countries are adopting an opt-out (presumed consent) policy, meaning that individuals are deemed donors unless they expressly refused so. Although opt-out countries tend to have higher donation rates, there is no conclusive evidence that this is caused by the policy itself. The main objective of this study is to better assess the direct impact of consent policy defaults per se on deceased organ recovery rates when considering the role of the family in the decision-making process. This study does not take into account any indirect effects of defaults, such as potential psychological and behavioural effects on individuals and their relatives. Design Based on previous work regarding consent policies, we created a conceptual model of the decision-making process for deceased organ recovery that included any scenario that could be directly influenced by opt-in or opt-out policies. We then applied this model to internationally published data of the consent process to determine how frequently policy defaults could apply. Main outcome measures We measure the direct impact that opt-in and opt-out policies have per se on deceased organ recovery. Results Our analysis shows that opt-in and opt-out have strictly identical outcomes in eight out of nine situations. They only differ when neither the deceased nor the family have expressed a preference and defaults therefore apply. The direct impact of consent policy defaults is typically circumscribed to a range of 0%-5% of all opportunities for organ recovery. Our study also shows that the intervention of the family improves organ retrieval under opt-in but hinders it under opt-out. Conclusions This study may warn policy makers that, by emphasising the need to introduce presumed consent to increase organ recovery rates, they might be overestimating the influence of the default and underestimating the power granted to families.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Australian Perspectives on Opt-In and Opt-Out Consent Systems for Deceased Organ Donation
    Hyde, Melissa K.
    Masser, Barbara M.
    Edwards, Abigail R. A.
    Ferguson, Eamonn
    PROGRESS IN TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 31 (04) : 357 - 367
  • [2] Assessing Global Organ Donation Policies: Opt-In vs Opt-Out
    Etheredge, Harriet Rosanne
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2021, 14 : 1985 - 1998
  • [3] An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study
    Shepherd, Lee
    O'Carroll, Ronan E.
    Ferguson, Eamonn
    BMC MEDICINE, 2014, 12
  • [4] An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study
    Lee Shepherd
    Ronan E O’Carroll
    Eamonn Ferguson
    BMC Medicine, 12
  • [5] Perspectives on Opt-Out Versus Opt-In Legislation for Deceased Organ Donation: An Opinion Piece
    Tennankore, Karthik K.
    Klarenbach, Scott
    Goldberg, Aviva
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2021, 8
  • [6] Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems
    Arshad, Adam
    Anderson, Benjamin
    Sharif, Adnan
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 95 (06) : 1453 - 1460
  • [7] Opt-in or opt-out for organ transplantation
    Beloucif, Sadek
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 25 (02) : 199 - 203
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Opt-out Versus Opt-in Consent on Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation (2006–2016)
    M. Usman Ahmad
    Afif Hanna
    Ahmed-Zayn Mohamed
    Alex Schlindwein
    Caitlin Pley
    Ingrid Bahner
    Rahul Mhaskar
    Gavin J. Pettigrew
    Tambi Jarmi
    World Journal of Surgery, 2019, 43 : 3161 - 3171
  • [9] Opt-in Vs. Opt-out of Organ Donation in Scotland: Bioethical analysis
    Lee, Allister
    Tham, Joseph
    NEW BIOETHICS-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE BODY, 2022, 28 (04): : 341 - 349
  • [10] A Systematic Review of Opt-out Versus Opt-in Consent on Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation (2006-2016)
    Ahmad, M. Usman
    Hanna, Afif
    Mohamed, Ahmed-Zayn
    Schlindwein, Alex
    Pley, Caitlin
    Bahner, Ingrid
    Mhaskar, Rahul
    Pettigrew, Gavin J.
    Jarmi, Tambi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (12) : 3161 - 3171