A Constitutive Model Controlling Damping for 2D and 3D Site Response

被引:0
|
作者
Yniesta, Samuel [1 ]
Brandenberg, Scott J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Montreal, Dept Civil Geol & Min Engn, Montreal, PQ H3T 1J4, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Modulus reduction and damping curves are commonly used as input parameters in site response analyses. Until very recently, constitutive models for nonlinear site response analysis could not accurately capture both the desired modulus reduction and damping behavior due to flaws in the assumed functional form for the backbone curve, and/or flaws in the unload-reload relationship. New relationships that solve these issues have recently been proposed, however, they are restricted to defining the in-plane stress-strain relationship for a single plane of shear, and are therefore only appropriate for 1D site response. This paper presents a multi-axial generalization of one of these 1D models, enabling its use in 2D and 3D site response. The 1D model is first briefly described, followed by the multi-axial generalization in terms of stress and strain invariants. The modulus reduction and damping curves are defined in terms of stress ratios rather than shear strains, which allows the model to better capture changes in confining pressure during undrained loading. An example is presented to illustrate fundamental differences in multiaxial versus 1D loading.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 24
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248
  • [2] Damping in 2D and 3D dilute Bose gases
    Chung, Ming-Chiang
    Bhattacherjee, Aranya B.
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2009, 11
  • [3] Controlling 3D Objects in 2D Image Synthesis
    Brehm S.
    Barthel F.
    Lienhart R.
    SN Computer Science, 4 (1)
  • [4] Design in 2D, model in 3D: Live 3D pose generation from 2D sketches
    Tosco, Paolo
    Mackey, Mark
    Cheeseright, Tim
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [5] Controlling the scatterplot shapes of 2D and 3D multidimensional projections
    Machado, Alister
    Telea, Alexandru
    Behrisch, Michael
    COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK, 2024, 124
  • [6] FPSO roll damping prediction from CFD and 2D and 3D model tests investigations
    Ledoux, A
    Molin, B
    De Jouette, C
    Coudray, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH (2004) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 1, 2004, : 687 - 695
  • [7] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [8] An analysis of the 2D demultiple and the 3D demultiple for a 3D complex model
    Ikelle, LT
    JOURNAL OF SEISMIC EXPLORATION, 2005, 13 (04): : 303 - 321
  • [9] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [10] INSTANCE SEGMENTATION OF 3D MESH MODEL BY INTEGRATING 2D AND 3D DATA
    Wang, W. X.
    Zhong, G. X.
    Huang, J. J.
    Li, X. M.
    Xie, L. F.
    GEOSPATIAL WEEK 2023, VOL. 48-1, 2023, : 1677 - 1684