T1-weighted cine FLASH is superior to IR imaging of post-infarction myocardial viability at 4.7T

被引:15
|
作者
Thomas, D
Dumont, C
Pickup, S
Misselwitz, B
Zhou, R
Horowitz, J
Ferrari, VA
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc,Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Schering AG, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
heart; experimental studies; infarction-MR; comparative studies-MR;
D O I
10.1080/10976640500451986
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose : Data are unavailable for rational selection of pulse sequences to assess post-infarction myocardial viability in rodents at high field strength. We implemented a widely used clinical inversion recovery (IR) sequence at 4.7T and compared the results to a heavily T1-weighted cine FLASH sequence (T1-CF) for assessment of infarction size. Materials and Methods : Eleven infarcted rats were examined within 24 h of infarction after injection of Gadophrin-3 contrast agent. Images were acquired using both pulse sequences and a standard cine (SC) sequence. Estimates of infarct size were compared to TTC. Global LV function was compared between the T1-CF and SC sequences. Results : SNR, relative SNR, and CNR for the infarcted and normal myocardium were significantly greater for the IR sequence. Infarction size was overestimated by both sequences, but correlated highly and showed very close agreement with TTC. Global function revealed no significant differences between T1-CF and SC. Conclusion : Both IR and T1-CF produced reliable results for assessment of infarction size at 4.7T. While the IR sequence delivers better overall SNR and CNR, the T1-CF allows concomitant assessment of global cardiac function with a much shorter acquisition time.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 352
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] T1-weighted Cine FLASH is superior to IR imaging of post-infarction myocardial viability at 4.7T (vol 8, pg 345, 2006)
    Thomas, D
    Dumont, C
    Pickup, S
    Misselwitz, B
    Zhou, R
    Horowitz, J
    Ferrari, VA
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2006, 8 (04) : 683 - 683
  • [2] Recent myocardial infarction: Assessment with unenhanced T1-weighted MR imaging
    Goldfarb, James W.
    Arnold, Sheeba
    Han, Jing
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (01) : 245 - 250
  • [3] T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging shows fatty deposition after myocardial infarction
    Goldfarb, James W.
    Arnold, Sheeba
    Roth, Marguerite
    Han, Jing
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 57 (05) : 828 - 834
  • [4] ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - COMPARISON OF T2-WEIGHTED AND T1-WEIGHTED GADOLINIUM-DTPA ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    MATHEIJSSEN, NAA
    DEROOS, A
    VANDERWALL, EE
    DOORNBOS, J
    VANDIJKMAN, PRM
    BRUSCHKE, AVG
    VANVOORTHUISEN, AE
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 17 (02) : 460 - 469
  • [5] CONTRAST IN RAPID MR IMAGING - T1-WEIGHTED AND T2-WEIGHTED IMAGING
    BUXTON, RB
    EDELMAN, RR
    ROSEN, BR
    WISMER, GL
    BRADY, TJ
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1987, 11 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [6] Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Is Superior to T1-weighted Imaging for Detecting and Measuring Gadolinium
    Wang, Yi
    Prince, Martin R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 151 - 153
  • [7] Hyperfast T1-weighted FLASH brain perfusion measurement
    Heid, O
    Ozdoba, C
    Schroth, G
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 1535 - 1535
  • [8] Mapping myocardial viability using interleaved T1-T*2 weighted imaging
    Li, G
    Dail, GP
    Xiang, B
    Mark, J
    Tomanek, B
    Liu, HY
    Deslauriers, R
    Tian, GH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2004, 20 (02): : 135 - 143
  • [9] Assessment of Silent T1-weighted head imaging at 7 T
    Costagli, Mauro
    Symms, Mark R.
    Angeli, Lorenzo
    Kelley, Douglas A. C.
    Biagi, Laura
    Farnetani, Andrea
    Rua, Catarina
    Donatelli, Graziella
    Tiberi, Gianluigi
    Tosetti, Michela
    Cosottini, Mirco
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) : 1879 - 1888
  • [10] Advances in T1-Weighted and T2-Weighted Imaging in the Abdomen and Pelvis
    Ream, Justin M.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 53 (03) : 583 - +