Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis - Classification and implications for long-term outcome

被引:1000
|
作者
Mehran, R
Dangas, G
Abizaid, AS
Mintz, GS
Lansky, AJ
Satler, LF
Pichard, AD
Kent, KM
Stone, GW
Leon, MB
机构
[1] Washington Hosp Ctr, Cardiovasc Res Fdn, Angiog Core Lab, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Washington Hosp Ctr, Intravasc Ultrasound Imaging Lab, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[3] Washington Hosp Ctr, Cardiac Catheterizat Lab, Washington, DC 20010 USA
关键词
restenosis; angioplasty; stents; angiography;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.100.18.1872
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-The angiographic presentation of in-stent restenosis (ISR) may convey prognostic information on subsequent target vessel revascularizations (TLR). Methods and Results-We developed an angiographic classification of ISR according to the geographic distribution of intimal hyperplasia in reference to the implanted stent. Pattern I includes focal (less than or equal to 10 mm in length) lesions, pattern II is ISR>10 mm within the stent, pattern III includes ISR>10 mm extending outside the stent, and pattern IV is totally occluded ISR. We classified a total of 288 ISR lesions in 245 patients and verified the angiographic accuracy of the classification by intravascular ultrasound. Pattern I was found in 42% of patients, pattern II in 21%, pattern III in 30%, and pattern IV in 7%. Previously recurrent ISR was more frequent with increasing grades of classification (9%, 20%, 34%, and 50% for classes I to IV, respectively; P = 0.0001), as was diabetes (28%, 32%, 39%, and 48% in classes I to IV, respectively; P < 0.01), Angioplasty and stenting were used predominantly in classes I and II, whereas classes III and IV were treated with atheroablation. Final diameter stenosis ranged between 21% and 28% (P = NS among ISR patterns). TLR increased with increasing ISR class; it was 19%, 35%, 50%, and 83% in classes I to IV, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes (odds ratio, 2.8), previously recurrent ISR (odds ratio, 2.7), and ISR class (odds ratio, 1.7) were independent predictors of TLR. Conclusions-The introduced angiographic classification is prognostically important, and it may be used for appropriate and early patient triage for clinical and investigational purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:1872 / 1878
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regarding "Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: Classification and implications for long term outcome"
    de Borst, Gert J.
    Moll, Frans L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 47 (06) : 1379 - 1380
  • [2] Stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: Long-term outcome
    Holmes, DR
    Berger, PB
    Rihal, CS
    Garratt, KN
    Bell, MR
    Mathew, V
    Bresnahan, JF
    Barsness, GW
    Grill, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 80A - 81A
  • [3] Regarding "Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: Classification and implications for long term outcome" - Reply
    Lal, Brajesh K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 47 (06) : 1380 - 1380
  • [4] Angiographic patterns in in-stent restenosis and implications on subsequent revascularization
    Kini, A
    Marmur, JD
    Dangas, G
    Choudhary, S
    Sharma, SK
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2000, 49 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [5] Stenting the stent:: Initial results and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary stenting for patients with in-stent restenosis
    Alfonso, F
    Cequier, A
    Zueco, J
    Morís, C
    Suárez, CP
    Colman, T
    Esplugas, E
    Pérez-Vizcayno, MJ
    Fernández, C
    Macaya, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 85 (03): : 327 - 332
  • [6] Angiographic patterns of Wingspan in-stent restenosis
    Albuquerque, Felipe C.
    Levy, Elad I.
    Turk, Aquilla S.
    Niemann, David B.
    Aagaard-Kienitz, Beverly
    Pride, G. Lee, Jr.
    Purdy, Phillip D.
    Welch, Babu C.
    Woo, Henry H.
    Rasmussen, Peter A.
    Hopkins, L. Nelson
    Masaryk, Thomas J.
    McDougall, Cameron G.
    Fiorella, David J.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [7] Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with occlusive in-stent restenosis treated with (32p) β-brachytherapy
    Ortolani, P
    Marzocchi, A
    Aquilina, M
    Gaiba, W
    Neri, S
    Bunkheila, F
    Lombardo, E
    Pini, S
    Marrozzini, C
    Palmerini, T
    Taglieri, N
    Sbarzaglia, P
    Reggiani, MLB
    Barbieri, E
    Branzi, A
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (04) : 433 - 438
  • [8] Angiographic patterns of Wingspan in-stent restenosis - Comments
    Armonda, Rocco A.
    Hurley, Michael A.
    Bendolk, Bernard R.
    Amar, Arun P.
    Vifiuela, Fernando
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (01) : 27 - 28
  • [9] Treatment of in-stent restenosis with sirolimus-eluting stent:: Long-term clinical outcome
    Sheiban, Imad
    Chiribiri, Amedeo
    Beninati, Serena
    Moretti, Claudio
    Omede, Pierluigi
    Sciuto, Filippo
    Meliga, Emauele
    Grossomarra, Walter
    Trevi, Giampaolo
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 98 (8A): : 154M - 155M
  • [10] Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: Classification and implications for longterm outcome
    Lal, Brajesh K.
    Kaperonis, Elias A.
    Cuadra, Salvador
    Kapadia, Indravadan
    Hobson, Robert W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 46 (05) : 833 - 840