Turnitin and peer review in ESL academic writing classrooms

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Jinrong [1 ]
Li, Mimi [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Writing & Linguist, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Commerce, Dept Literature & Languages, Commerce, TX USA
来源
LANGUAGE LEARNING & TECHNOLOGY | 2018年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
Writing; Feedback; Computer-Mediated Communication; Instructional Context; RESPONSE GROUPS; FEEDBACK; PERCEPTIONS; LEARNERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the benefits of peer review, there are still challenges that need to be addressed to make it more effective for L2 students. With the development of technology, computer-mediated peer review has captured increasing attention from L2 writing researchers and instructors. While Turnitin is known for its use in detecting plagiarism, its newly developed module, PeerMark, aims to facilitate peer review. In this article, we share our experience of using Turnitin for peer review in an ESL academic writing course and discuss its advantages, its limitations, and how different features of PeerMark may be used to address some of the challenges identified in previous research on peer review in the L2 writing classroom. Throughout a semester, the students were required to complete three peer review tasks through Turnitin. Based on the instructor's experience and the students' reports, we found that Turnitin could help shift students' attention from local to global issues in writing, scaffold students in their effort to provide more helpful comments and to make connections between specific suggestions and holistic advice for writing, and facilitate classroom management during peer review.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 41
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ESL STUDENTS IN WRITING CLASSROOMS
    Duka, Vladimira
    NASLEDE, 2012, 9 (22): : 271 - 277
  • [2] A Literature Review of the Effects of Peer Review on ESL/EFL Writing
    陈瑞
    校园英语, 2020, (06) : 39 - 40
  • [3] A Brief Review of Peer Review Research in ESL and EFL Writing Context
    Jiang Chen
    Shi Likun
    2018 NORTHEAST ASIA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LINGUSTICS, LITERATURE AND TEACHING, 2018 NALLTS, VOLS A-C, 2018, : 123 - 128
  • [4] CALL in Lebanese elementary ESL writing classrooms
    Fidaoui, Diana
    Bahous, Rima
    Bacha, Nahla N.
    COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2010, 23 (02) : 151 - 168
  • [5] PEER-REVIEW NEGOTIATIONS - REVISION ACTIVITIES IN ESL WRITING INSTRUCTION
    MENDONCA, CO
    JOHNSON, KE
    TESOL QUARTERLY, 1994, 28 (04) : 745 - 769
  • [6] The Use of Turnitin to Teach Academic Integrity in Essay Writing Coursework
    Hapsari, Astri
    Ghali, Mohammad Izam
    Ammar, Miftah Haniful
    2020 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-EDUCATION, E-BUSINESS, E-MANAGEMENT, AND E-LEARNING (IC4E 2020), 2020, : 169 - 173
  • [7] An Evaluation of a Textbook for Integrating Reading and Writing in ESL Classrooms
    Yung, Kevin Wai-Ho
    JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2019, 16 (04): : 1447 - 1453
  • [8] An Analysis on the Peer Review Comments in Writing for ESL Students in the Flipping Classroom Context
    Yi, Wang
    Xia, Wu
    Ying, Cui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 NORTHEAST ASIA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LINGUSTICS, LITERATURE AND TEACHING (NALLTS), VOLS A-C, 2017, : 137 - 142
  • [9] Pivoting peer review outside of the classroom using Turnitin
    Stone, Koni
    Aleman, Elvin
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [10] Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors
    Shi, Ling
    CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES, 2007, 64 (02): : 365 - 367