Clinical Results of Ear Elevations in Patients with Microtia Using Skin Grafts from Three Donor Sites: A Retrospective Study

Background Skin grafts, frequently used for ear elevation in ear reconstructions, may suffer from color mismatches, scar hypertrophy, secondary contraction, and auricular sulcus depth differences. To determine the most suitable donor area, we compared the contralateral postauricular area, groin, and scalp as potential donor sites. Methods Since 2008, we have used three donor sites for obtaining skin grafts used in ear reconstructions. Full-thickness groin skin, split-thickness grafts from the scalp, and contralateral postauricular and groin composite full-thickness skin grafts were used in 202, 231, and 195 patients, respectively. Photographic assessments were used to assess color matching, sulcus depth, cranioauricular angle symmetry, and flatness of the skin grafts; surgical complications were also documented. Results Among the three donor sites, there were no significant differences in the color matching scores (p = 0.456). The scalp donor scores had significantly lower mean scores for sulcus depth and symmetry and for graft flatness scores than the other donor sites. The assessment scores between the groin and postauricular donor groups were similar. Each donor site was associated with some surgical complications. However, postauricular skin, when combined with groin skin, demonstrated the best cosmetic results and the fewest complications. Conclusion All three donor sites are viable options for skin graft donor sites in ear elevation surgeries. Although the advantages and disadvantages of each site should be explained to the patient, the ultimate donor site selection may be determined according to patient and surgeon preferences.