Social networks, social support mechanisms, and quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis

被引:145
|
作者
Kroenke, Candyce H. [1 ]
Kwan, Marilyn L. [2 ]
Neugut, Alfred I. [3 ]
Ergas, Isaac J. [1 ]
Wright, Jaime D. [4 ]
Caan, Bette J. [2 ]
Hershman, Dawn [3 ]
Kushi, Lawrence H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Grad Theol Union, Berkeley, CA 94709 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Social networks; Social relationships; Breast cancer; Quality of life; FACT-B; Women; BODY-MASS INDEX; PSYCHOSOCIAL SUPPORT; DIETARY PATTERNS; WEIGHT CHANGE; SURVIVAL; MORTALITY; WOMEN; THERAPY; VALIDATION; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2477-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We examined mechanisms through which social relationships influence quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer survivors. This study included 3,139 women from the Pathways Study who were diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2011 and provided data on social networks (the presence of a spouse or intimate partner, religious/social ties, volunteering, and numbers of close friends and relatives), social support (tangible support, emotional/informational support, affection, positive social interaction), and QOL, measured by the FACT-B, approximately 2 months post diagnosis. We used logistic models to evaluate associations between social network size, social support, and lower versus higher than median QOL scores. We further stratified by stage at diagnosis and treatment. In multivariate-adjusted analyses, women who were characterized as socially isolated had significantly lower FACT-B (OR = 2.18, 95 % CI: 1.72-2.77), physical well-being (WB) (OR = 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.27-2.03), functional WB (OR = 2.08, 95 % CI: 1.65-2.63), social WB (OR = 3.46, 95 % CI: 2.73-4.39), and emotional WB(OR = 1.67, 95 % CI: 1.33-2.11) scores and higher breast cancer symptoms (OR = 1.48, 95 % CI: 1.18-1.87) compared with socially integrated women. Each social network member independently predicted higher QOL. Simultaneous adjustment for social networks and social support partially attenuated associations between social networks and QOL. The strongest mediator and type of social support that was most predictive of QOL outcomes was "positive social interaction.'' However, each type of support was important depending on outcome, stage, and treatment status. Larger social networks and greater social support were related to higher QOL after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Effective social support interventions need to evolve beyond social-emotional interventions and need to account for disease severity and treatment status.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 527
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social networks, social support mechanisms, and quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis
    Candyce H. Kroenke
    Marilyn L. Kwan
    Alfred I. Neugut
    Isaac J. Ergas
    Jaime D. Wright
    Bette J. Caan
    Dawn Hershman
    Lawrence H. Kushi
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2013, 139 : 515 - 527
  • [2] Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis
    Kroenke, CH
    Kubzansky, LD
    Schernhammer, ES
    Holmes, MD
    Kawachi, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (07) : 1105 - 1111
  • [3] Social networks, social support, and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Life After Breast Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) Study
    Kroenke, Candyce H.
    Quesenberry, Charles
    Kwan, Marilyn L.
    Sweeney, Carol
    Castillo, Adrienne
    Caan, Bette J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 137 (01) : 261 - 271
  • [4] Social networks, social support, and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Life After Breast Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) Study
    Candyce H. Kroenke
    Charles Quesenberry
    Marilyn L. Kwan
    Carol Sweeney
    Adrienne Castillo
    Bette J. Caan
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2013, 137 : 261 - 271
  • [5] Social networks, social support and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis
    Kroenke, Candyce H.
    Michael, Yvonne
    Tindle, Hilary
    Gage, Elizabeth
    Chlebowski, Rowan
    Garcia, Lorena
    Messina, Catherine
    Manson, JoAnn E.
    Caan, Bette J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 133 (01) : 375 - 385
  • [6] Social networks, social support and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis
    Candyce H. Kroenke
    Yvonne Michael
    Hilary Tindle
    Elizabeth Gage
    Rowan Chlebowski
    Lorena Garcia
    Catherine Messina
    JoAnn E. Manson
    Bette J. Caan
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 133 : 375 - 385
  • [7] Social support and survival after breast cancer diagnosis
    Beasley, Jeannette
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Bersch, Andrew J.
    Ceballos, Rachel M.
    Titus-Ernstoff, Linda
    Egan, Kathleen M.
    Newcomb, Polly A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2008, 35 : S146 - S146
  • [8] Social networks and survival after breast cancer diagnosis
    Beasley, Jeannette M.
    Newcomb, Polly A.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Hampton, John M.
    Ceballos, Rachel M.
    Titus-Ernstoff, Linda
    Egan, Kathleen M.
    Holmes, Michelle D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 4 (04): : 372 - 380
  • [9] Social networks and survival after breast cancer diagnosis
    Jeannette M. Beasley
    Polly A. Newcomb
    Amy Trentham-Dietz
    John M. Hampton
    Rachel M. Ceballos
    Linda Titus-Ernstoff
    Kathleen M. Egan
    Michelle D. Holmes
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2010, 4 : 372 - 380
  • [10] Optimism, social support, coping and quality of life after breast cancer: Direct and indirect effects
    Cousson-Gelie, F.
    Barrault, M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2009, 24 : 138 - 138