The influence of grease trap sludge sterilization on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge

被引:10
|
作者
Grosser, A. [1 ]
Neczaj, E. [1 ]
Jasinska, Anna [1 ]
Celary, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Czestochowa Tech Univ, Fac Infrastruct & Environm, Czestochowa, Poland
[2] Cent Lab Measurements & Res, Jastrzebie Zdroj, Poland
关键词
Animal by-product; Anaerobic co-digestion; Grease trap sludge; Sewage sludge; Sterilization; Methane yield; WASTE ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; SLAUGHTERHOUSE WASTE; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ORGANIC FRACTION; BY-PRODUCTS; FOOD WASTE; FAT; ENERGY; PRETREATMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.108
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of sterilization of grease trap sludge on the performance of their joint anaerobic digestion with sewage sludge was investigated. The process was carried out in two continuously stirred-tank glass reactors at mesophilic conditions. The hydraulic retention time was 10 days, and the experiment was divided into three stages. In two stages, anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge was carried out. In the first stage, the batch assay was applied to promote the development of an anaerobic community. In the second stage, the reactors were fed with sewage sludge in a semi-continuous regime. Meanwhile, in the next step, grease trap sludge was co-digested with sewage sludge. For the first period of the 3rd stage, grease trap sludge without sterilization was dosed into feedstock. In the last period, waste prior to introduction to the feedstock, was sterilized at 133 degrees C for 20 min at a steam pressure equal to 3 bars. The results of the statistical analyses revealed that the addition of co-substrates to the feedstock had a significant influence on biogas yield, as well as volatile solids removal. However, the conditioning of the grease trap sludge did not have a significant statistical effect on the production of biogas (enhanced by 3%) and volatile solids removal. Moreover, there were no statistically significant changes in the composition of biogas. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:988 / 997
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-digestion of grease trap sludge and sewage sludge
    Davidsson, A.
    Lovstedt, C.
    Jansen, J. la Cour
    Gruvberger, C.
    Aspegren, H.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (06) : 986 - 992
  • [2] ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF SEWAGE SLUDGE AND GREASE TRAP SLUDGE IN CONTINUOUS CO-DIGESTION
    Neczaj, E.
    Bien, J.
    Grosser, A.
    Worwag, M.
    Kacprzak, M.
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (02): : 141 - 148
  • [3] Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and grease trap: Assessment of enzyme addition
    Donoso-Bravo, Andres
    Fdz-Polanco, Maria
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 48 (5-6) : 936 - 940
  • [4] Anaerobic co-digestion of grease sludge and sewage sludge: The effect of organic loading and grease sludge content
    Noutsopoulos, C.
    Mamais, D.
    Antoniou, K.
    Avramides, C.
    Oikonomopoulos, P.
    Fountoulakis, I.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 131 : 452 - 459
  • [5] IMPACT OF ADDING BIOPREPARATIONS ON THE ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF SEWAGE SLUDGE WITH GREASE TRAP WASTE
    Worwag, Malgorzata
    CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2016, 22 (03) : 167 - 178
  • [6] Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and molasses
    Kalemba, Katarzyna
    Barbusinski, Krzysztof
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (ASEE17), 2017, 22
  • [7] Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge and municipal solid waste as co-substrates
    Grosser, A.
    Neczaj, E.
    Singh, B. R.
    Almas, A. R.
    Brattebo, H.
    Kacprzak, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 155 : 249 - 260
  • [9] Biomass adaptation over anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and trapped grease waste
    Silvestre, G.
    Rodriguez-Abalde, A.
    Fernandez, B.
    Flotats, X.
    Bonmati, A.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (13) : 6830 - 6836
  • [10] Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste
    Prabhu, Meghanath S.
    Mutnuri, Srikanth
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (04) : 307 - 315