Association between deficient cesarean delivery scar and cesarean scar syndrome

被引:14
|
作者
Dosedla, Erik [1 ]
Gal, Peter [2 ]
Calda, Pavel [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavol Jozef Safarik Kosice, Hosp AGEL Kosice Saca Inc, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kosice 04015, Slovakia
[2] Univ Pavol Jozef Safarik Kosice, Fac Med, Ctr Clin & Preclin Res MEDIPK, Kosice 04001, Slovakia
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Apolinarska 18, Prague 12851 2, Czech Republic
[4] Gen Teaching Hosp, Apolinarska 18, Prague 12851 2, Czech Republic
关键词
cesarean delivery; cesarean delivery scar; cesarean scar syndrome; scar defect; ultrasound; SECTION SCARS; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; UTERINE SCAR; PREVALENCE; ULTRASOUND; PREGNANCY; DIAGNOSIS; SYMPTOMS; HISTORY; NICHE;
D O I
10.1002/jcu.22911
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Introduction The aim of our study was to compare long-term morbidity after elective and emergency cesarean delivery (CD). Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in 200 women delivered by CD. Ultrasound examinations were performed transvaginally at 6 weeks and 18 months after CD. Clinical data were collected at the time of CD and after 18 months. Results In the group of 200 women, 29% underwent emergency and 71% elective CD. Then, 6 weeks and 18 months after CD, a severe scar defect was present in 7% and 5%, respectively (P= .4). After 18 months of CD, 17% (34/200) of women had evidence of adhesions of the vesicouterine pouch. Severe CD scar defects were significant predictors for adhesion formation in vesicouterine pouch (OR 3.14, 95% CI, 1.54-4.74), pelvic pain (OR 1.68, 95% CI, 0.22-3.14), dysmenorrhea (OR 2.12, 95% CI, 0.74-3.50), and dyspareunia (OR 1.38, 95% CI, 0.09-2.67). Uterine scar defects detected at 6 weeks after elective CD were detectable at 18 months in only 40% of cases, whereas uterine scar defects after emergency CD were still detectable in 87% of cases. Conclusion Uterine scar defects are more frequent at 18 weeks after emergency CD, than after elective CD (40% vs 87%). Women with severe scar defects have higher risk of adhesion formation, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 543
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cesarean delivery scar
    Järvelä, IY
    Sladkevicius, P
    Kelly, S
    Ojha, K
    Campbell, S
    Nargund, G
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 19 (06) : 632 - 633
  • [2] Hemorrhage From a Cesarean Scar Is a Cause of Cesarean Scar Syndrome
    Tanimura, Satoshi
    Hosono, Takashi
    Minami, Rie
    Funamoto, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (03) : 340 - 341
  • [3] Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome
    Higuchi, Asuka
    Tsuji, Shunichiro
    Nobuta, Yuri
    Nakamura, Akiko
    Katsura, Daisuke
    Amano, Tsukuru
    Kimura, Fuminori
    Tanimura, Satoshi
    Murakami, Takashi
    REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [4] Cesarean Delivery Scar Ectopic Pregnancy
    Little, Elizabeth A.
    Moussavian, Bahar
    Horrow, Mindy M.
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2010, 26 (02) : 107 - 109
  • [5] Evaluation of Association Between Adenomyosis and Cesarean Scar Defect
    Katouli, Fatemeh Shakki
    Zebardast, Jayran
    Tavoli, Zahra
    Bayani, Leila
    Azizinik, Fahimeh
    Moradpour, Moein
    Mardani, Reza
    Meimani, Najme
    Fathi, Somayeh
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (03) : 553 - 560
  • [6] The cesarean scar
    Schwarz, OH
    Paddock, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1925, 10 : 153 - 171
  • [7] Cesarean scar pregnancie
    Boujoual, Majdouline
    Moussaoui, Driss Rahali
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 30
  • [8] Pregnancy in a Cesarean scar
    Vial, Y
    Petignat, P
    Hohlfeld, P
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 16 (06) : 592 - 593
  • [9] Cesarean scar pregnancy
    Hanacek, J.
    Herman, H.
    Krepelka, P.
    Haslik, L.
    Brandejsova, A.
    Krofta, L.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 87 (03): : 193 - 197
  • [10] Cesarean scar pregnancy
    Matyszkiewicz, Anna
    Jach, Robert
    Nocun, Agnieszka
    Posadzka, Ewa
    Huras, Hubert
    Pitynski, Kazimierz
    Wolski, Hubert
    Basta, Pawel
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2015, 86 (10) : 791 - 798