Biological sulfate removal from gypsum contaminated construction and demolition debris

被引:25
|
作者
Kijjanapanich, Pimluck [1 ]
Annachhatre, Ajit P. [2 ]
Esposito, Giovanni [3 ]
van Hullebusch, Eric D. [4 ]
Lens, Piet N. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] UNESCO IHE Inst Water Educ, Pollut Prevent & Resource Recovery Chair Grp, NL-2611 AX Delft, Netherlands
[2] Asian Inst Technol, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
[3] Univ Cassino & Southern Lazio, Dept Civil & Mech Engn, I-03043 Cassino, FR, Italy
[4] Univ Paris Est, Lab Geomat & Environm, EA 4508, UPEMLV, F-77454 Marne La Vallee, France
关键词
Construction and demolition debris; Gypsum contaminated waste; Leaching; Solid sulfate; Sulfate reducing bacteria; UASB; HEAVY-METALS; ELECTRON-DONORS; REDUCING BACTERIA; REDUCTION; PHOSPHOGYPSUM; CULTURE; REACTOR; GROWTH; FINES; PHASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Construction and demolition debris (CDD) contains high levels of sulfate that can cause detrimental environmental impacts when disposed without adequate treatment. In landfills, sulfate can be converted to hydrogen sulfide under anaerobic conditions. CDD can thus cause health impacts or odor problems to landfill employees and surrounding residents. Reduction of the sulfate content of CDD is an option to overcome these problems. This study aimed at developing a biological sulfate removal system to reduce the sulfate content of gypsum contaminated CDD in order to decrease the amount of solid waste, to improve the quality of CDD waste for recycling purposes and to recover sulfur from CDD. The treatment leached out the gypsum contained in CDD by water in a leaching column. The sulfate loaded leachate was then treated in a biological sulfate reducing Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor to convert the sulfate to sulfide. The UASB reactor was operated at 23 +/- 3 degrees C with a hydraulic retention time and upflow velocity of 15.5 h and 0.1 m h(-1), respectively while ethanol was added as electron donor at a final organic loading rate of 3.46 g COD L-1 reactor d(-1). The CDD leachate had a pH of 8-9 and sulfate dissolution rates of 526.4 and 609.8 mg L-1 d(-1) were achieved in CDD gypsum and CDD sand, respectively. Besides, it was observed that the gypsum dissolution was the rate limiting step for the biological treatment of CDD. The sulfate removal efficiency of the system stabilized at around 85%, enabling the reuse of the UASB effluent for the leaching step, proving the versatility of the bioreactor for practical applications. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 91
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biological sulfate removal from construction and demolition debris leachate: Effect of bioreactor configuration
    Kijjanapanich, Pimluck
    Do, Anh Tien
    Annachhatre, Ajit P.
    Esposito, Giovanni
    Yeh, Daniel H.
    Lens, Piet N. L.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2014, 269 : 38 - 44
  • [2] Sulfate leaching from recovered construction and demolition debris fines
    Jang, YC
    Townsend, T
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 5 (03): : 203 - 217
  • [3] REALight - Lightweight granulates and REA gypsum made of fine-grained sulfate-contaminated construction and demolition waste
    Schnell, Alexander
    Rübner, Katrin
    Seher, Julia
    Müller, Anette
    Liebezeit, Steffen
    Fenner, Jacob
    Martin, Falk
    Pniok, Nicole
    ce/papers, 2023, 6 (06) : 530 - 536
  • [4] Chemical sulphate removal for treatment of construction and demolition debris leachate
    Kijjanapanich, Pimluck
    Annachhatre, Ajit P.
    Esposito, Giovanni
    Lens, Piet N. L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 35 (16) : 1989 - 1996
  • [5] APPLICATION OF COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS IN HEAVY METALS REMOVAL FROM INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER
    Jelic, Ivana V.
    Antonijevic, Dragi Lj.
    Sljivic-Ivanovic, Marija Z.
    Dimovic, Slavko D.
    THERMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 27 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [6] Construction, renovation and demolition (CRD) wastes contaminated by gypsum residues: Characterization, treatment and valorization
    Laadila, Mohamed Amine
    LeBihan, Yann
    Caron, Richard-Francois
    Vaneeckhaute, Celine
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 120 : 125 - 135
  • [7] Construction material from construction and demolition debris and lime production wastes
    Mymrin, Vsevolod A.
    Alekseev, Kirill P.
    Catai, Rodrigo E.
    Izzo, Ronaldo L. S.
    Rose, Juliana L.
    Nagalli, Andre
    Romano, Cezar A.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2015, 79 : 207 - 213
  • [8] Asphalt mixtures with construction and demolition debris
    Perez, I.
    Gallego, J.
    Toledano, M.
    Taibo, J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-TRANSPORT, 2010, 163 (04) : 165 - 174
  • [9] Gypsum and organic matter distribution in a mixed construction and demolition waste sorting process and their possible removal from outputs
    Montero, A.
    Tojo, Y.
    Matsuo, T.
    Matsuto, T.
    Yamada, M.
    Asakura, H.
    Ono, Y.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 175 (1-3) : 747 - 753
  • [10] Biological Sulfate Reduction for Treatment of Gypsum Contaminated Soils, Sediments, and Solid Wastes
    Kijjanapanich, Pimluck
    Annachhatre, Ajit P.
    Lens, Piet N. L.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 44 (10) : 1037 - 1070