Intraoperative mannitol during robotic-assisted-laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

被引:12
|
作者
Choi, Kellen [1 ]
Hill, Sharon [2 ]
Hale, Nathan [2 ]
Phillips, Stephen [3 ]
Deem, Samuel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, UofL Phys Outpatient Ctr, Urol Adult Off, 401 E Chestnut St,Suite 480, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Charleston Area Med Ctr, Dept Urol, 3100 MacCorkle Ave,Suite 602, Charleston, WV 25304 USA
[3] Mt Nittany Phys Grp, 905 Univ Dr, State Coll, PA 16801 USA
关键词
Mannitol; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Renal mass; Prospective; KIDNEY-FUNCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-018-0868-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Mannitol is routinely used during partial nephrectomies due to its renoprotective properties. With minimally invasive techniques, the need for mannitol has been questioned. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) has been shown to decrease warm ischemia time, which may potentially minimize the benefit of mannitol. To date, no prospective, randomized, controlled trials have investigated the use of mannitol in only robotic procedures. We hypothesize that the intraoperative mannitol use during RALPN provides no statistically significant benefit for post-operative renal function outcomes. We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, single surgeon, prospective study to assess renal function after RALPN. Patients were randomized into a control group with intravenous normal saline infusion prior to clamping of the vessels or to an experimental group with an infusion of mannitol. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were obtained prior to the surgery as well as post operatively at 24 h, 1 week, and 30 days. Preoperative eGFR showed no statistical differences between the groups and evaluation of median percent change in eGFR after surgery did not indicate a statistical difference between the groups after RALPN. After prospective analysis of the change in post-operative renal function of randomized groups who received 12 g of mannitol following RALPN, we determined that infusion of mannitol does not provide significant improvement of maintenance of renal functions after RALPN. Based on our results, we recommend discontinuing routine use of mannitol during RALPN.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 405
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraoperative mannitol during robotic-assisted-laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Kellen Choi
    Sharon Hill
    Nathan Hale
    Stephen Phillips
    Samuel Deem
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2019, 13 : 401 - 405
  • [2] Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Porter, James R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 377 - 378
  • [3] ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Porter, James R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 466 - 466
  • [4] Intraoperative Mannitol Not Essential During Partial Nephrectomy
    Cooper, Caleb A.
    Shum, Cheuk Fan
    Bahler, Clinton D.
    Sundaram, Chandru P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (04) : 354 - 358
  • [5] EXTRAPERITONEAL ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Emara, Amr M.
    Kommu, Sashi S.
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Barber, Neil J.
    Nedas, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A310 - A310
  • [6] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 : A67 - A67
  • [7] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Peschel, R
    Neururer, R
    Blute, ML
    DiMarco, DS
    Bartsch, G
    Gettman, MT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 471 - 471
  • [8] Partial nephrectomy - pro robotic assisted laparoscopic operation
    Nestler, S.
    Roos, F. C.
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (05): : 650 - 655
  • [9] Laparoscopic assisted robotic partial nephrectomy, a need of the hour
    Bhaskar, V.
    Mittal, V.
    Suryavanshi, M.
    Saxena, A.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 : 56 - 57
  • [10] IS ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FINANCIALLY WORTHWHILE?
    Elsamra, Sammy
    Leone, Andrew
    Lasser, Michael
    Thavaseelan, Simone
    Haleblian, George
    Pareek, Gyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E375 - E375