Social Farming: Heterogeneity in Social and Agricultural Relationships

被引:13
|
作者
Genova, Angela [1 ]
Maccaroni, Martina [1 ]
Vigano, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Urbino Carlo Bo, Dept Econ, Soc, Polit, I-61029 Urbino, Italy
关键词
regional regulations; critical discourse analysis; social innovation; multifunctional agriculture; diversification; organic agriculture; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; POLICIES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/su12124824
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social farming (SF) has emerged as a social innovation practice shaping heterogeneous approaches and results. This study discusses the complexity of SF policy and practices, and it is led by the main hypothesis that the relationship between agricultural and social dimensions might be very heterogeneous, not only in different national contexts but also within the same national and local level. SF policy and practices are investigated testing the hypothesis of three main different modalities of interaction according to how the social and the agricultural perspectives interact. In the first, social target is not involved in the production system of the farm and the farm is the context where actions and measures of a social nature take place. In the second type of interaction, the farm employs the beneficiaries in some of its production activities collaborating with the social services. The third is where the farm organizes its activities to actively employ targeted people to enhance their social inclusion and integration in the community. Italian SF policy and practices are analyzed as case study, through the lens of sociological critical discourse analysis regarding the regional regulatory documents, and interviews for local case studies. The results of the study show that SF policy and practices might be very heterogeneous also within the same national and local level, outlining different hybridization of social and agriculture actions that can be properly analyzed through the three SF model proposal. This study contributes to the broader debate on the various dimensions of sustainability, suggesting the need for further research on the efficiency of SF as local development model sustainable in economic, social and environmental terms.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOCIAL FARMING IN GERMANY: MULTIFUNCTIONALITY OF AGRICULTURAL FARMS
    Diconne, Sophie
    Hassler, Markus
    MITTEILUNGEN DER OSTERREICHISCHEN GEOGRAPHISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2021, 163 : 301 - 325
  • [2] Social heterogeneity of the agricultural companies in the Uruguayan countryside
    Rolle, Soledad Figueredo
    PAMPA, 2020, (22):
  • [3] Farming is not a joke: the entrepreneurship ecosystem of agricultural social enterprises
    Lorenz, Angelica Marie Therese C.
    Padre, Peter P.
    Ramos, Joanna Kathleen P.
    Mabalay, Adrian A.
    Aure, Patrick Adriel H.
    Blasa-Cheng, Angelique C.
    SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2024, 20 (09) : 1747 - 1769
  • [4] A Look at Social Heterogeneity from the Social Networks of Non-Agricultural Cooperatives
    Caballero Reyes, Claudia Maria
    Panellas Alvarez, Daybel
    ESTUDIOS DEL DESARROLLO SOCIAL-CUBA Y AMERICA LATINA, 2018, 6 (02): : 38 - 47
  • [5] Social Acceptance Scale-development of an instrument for the differentiated measurement of social acceptance in agricultural livestock farming
    Gier-Reinartz, Nadine R.
    Harms, Regina
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY, 2024, 19 (SUPPL 1) : 29 - 47
  • [6] Structure and evolution of online social relationships: Heterogeneity in unrestricted discussions
    Goh, K. -I.
    Eom, Y. -H.
    Jeong, H.
    Kahng, B.
    Kim, D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2006, 73 (06)
  • [7] Relationships between agricultural energy and farming indicators
    Martinho, V. J. P. D.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 132
  • [8] SOCIAL WORK IN SOCIAL FARMING IN THE CONCEPT OF EMPOWERMENT
    Hudcova, Eliska
    EUROPEAN COUNTRYSIDE, 2022, 14 (03): : 497 - 510
  • [9] Social distance, heterogeneity and social interactions
    Cont, Rama
    Loewe, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 46 (04) : 572 - 590
  • [10] SOCIAL STRATEGIES AND SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS
    WHITTEN, NE
    WHITTEN, DS
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 1972, 1 : 247 - 270