Consideration of Nontraditional Endpoints in the Assessment of Ecological Risk under the Endangered Species Act

被引:0
|
作者
Golden, Nancy H. [1 ]
Noguchi, George E. [1 ]
Paul, Keith A. [1 ]
Buford, Daniel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
关键词
ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; PESTICIDES; FRAMEWORK; RESPONSES; FISH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
As the field of environmental toxicology progresses, research is revealing effects on species that expand beyond the traditional endpoints of survival, growth, and reproduction as measured in single organism lab studies. Exposure to contaminants can result in adverse effects to endocrine function, olfaction, behavior, and other physiological impairments that may be exacerbated in combination with ecological stressors. Decisions regarding the management of species listed under the Endangered Species Act necessitate an examination of the best available data regarding all the effects of stressors on the conservation of those species, as well as treatment of uncertainty that is inclusive of all potential risks and is commensurate with their protected status. Analysis of potential linkages between sublethal responses of pesticides to higher-order responses in individuals and populations often requires extrapolation of incomplete data sets to provide protection to vulnerable species facing a myriad of potential threats. The adverse outcome pathway model provides a useful framework for the incorporation and use of currently available data, as well as a means to identify vital data gaps to be filled through future research and monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 282
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consideration of nontraditional endpoints in the assessment of ecological risk under the Endangered Species Act
    Golden, Nancy H.
    Noguchi, George
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [2] Consistent Extinction Risk Assessment under the US Endangered Species Act
    Boyd, Charlotte
    DeMaster, Douglas P.
    Waples, Robin S.
    Ward, Eric J.
    Taylor, Barbara L.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (03): : 328 - 336
  • [3] COST CONSIDERATION AND THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
    Baynes, Sheila
    [J]. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2015, 90 (03) : 961 - 1000
  • [4] Upholding science-based risk assessment under a weakened Endangered Species Act
    Munoz, Nicolas J.
    Obrist, Debora S.
    [J]. FACETS, 2020, 5
  • [5] Ecological risk assessment framework for endangered species assessments
    Teed, Scott
    Moore, Dwayne
    Winchell, Michael
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 250
  • [6] Chlorpyrifos agricultural use and the Endangered Species Act: Do refinements in ecological risk assessment address uncertainty?
    Poletika, Nicholas N.
    Moore, Dwayne R. J.
    Giddings, Jeffrey M.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 246
  • [7] The Endangered Species Act under threat
    Bean, MJ
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2006, 56 (02) : 98 - 98
  • [8] Conservation under the Endangered Species Act
    Gordon, RE
    Lacy, JK
    Streeter, JR
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 23 (03) : 359 - 419
  • [9] Development of a Species Status Assessment Process for Decisions under the US Endangered Species Act
    Smith, David R.
    Allan, Nathan L.
    McGowan, Conor P.
    Szymanski, Jennifer A.
    Oetker, Susan R.
    Bell, Heather M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (01): : 302 - 320
  • [10] Generic assessment endpoints are needed for ecological risk assessment
    Suter, GW
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (02) : 173 - 178